Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GTAX - Gilman & Ciocia, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unregmarket who wrote (66)	1/9/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 184

Rick, "Are the 3,1,2 stochastics always a precursor to 4,3,2 strength? Once 4,3,2 looks stronger, then what?" Often, the 2 will exhibit similar movement with the 4, 3, 2 lagging by about a day. What the 3, 1, 2 did yesterday was to break out of a downtrend that had a quick double bottom. That setup in the 3, 1, 2 is usually not strong enough by itself to telegraph a bump up in price (but there are several that do). That is why I moved from the 3, 1, 2 to the 4, 3, 2 which, as of yesterday's close, is a little more than halfway into an inverted head and shoulders. A breakout of that formation would telegraph a move of at least 20%. As it works its way through the IH&S over the next 3 to 5 trading days, I'll keep tabs on it. There are no guarantees that it will complete the formation and break out of it but it's working on it and it's a nice one since a neckline may be established across the value of 80. Doug R Doug R