SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David McCleary who wrote (24675)1/9/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: vic klimpl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
the problem as i see it that at times like these it is apparent that god made so many dumb people.ggg



To: David McCleary who wrote (24675)1/9/1998 11:07:00 AM
From: mad dog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41046
 
I respectfully disagree, David. I don't feel that WCOM would have allowed valuable space in their POPs to be taken up just to collect rent fees...I have to believe there will be some form of revenue sharing agreement. As far as the stock price on 2/2/98 goes, I tend to agree with you. My swag is $6.75

Mark



To: David McCleary who wrote (24675)1/10/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: SoliRA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41046
 
David McClearly,

I guess it breaks down to a simple analysis:

1) Is there a market?
2) Can FTEL satisfy a worthwhile piece of that market?
3) How does FTEL compare with potential or actual competitors for that slice?
4) Can FTEL meet production demands?
5) Can FTEL market its product well? If no one knows about it, it won't go anywhere.

The question of what the price will be on 2 Feb has an added complexity to it: How will other stock-market players see things?

Long-termers on this board are committed to a resounding "Yes!" to the first 5 questions. In the long-term, as you say, the price of the stock will depend on its earnings, present and future, pure and simple.

Thanks for your submission. Bob.