Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29711)	1/9/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Tritone_ch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Thank you Chuck! Any thoughts of the payment GPGI got from the refiner ? 15.000$ ..not bad for a start.

To: go4it who wrote (29711)	1/9/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: knight	Respond to of 35569

Chuck, You've backed me into a corner, perhaps there is no way out. I was going to let it rest, but now silence from me would indicate capitulation to strongarm tactics and removal of my freedom of speech. My comments were an expression of opinion on the posting tactics of the core IPM cheerleader. Anyone can go back through the previous postings and draw their own conclusion as to what took place. If this is character assasination, then so be it. If I am not heard from again, this last post will be a testament to the power of the IPM pro-posters. The ball is in your court, no hard feelings, I guess we all have some agenda in the removal of negative posters. knight

To: go4it who wrote (29711)	1/9/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck: "We are here to discuss IPM not the companies share holders." Best post in a long time! Joe

To: go4it who wrote (29711)	1/13/1998 10:26:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Charles; Personal attacks are permitted on non members of the community, where pertinent, read the terms of use, and CL might have been a past member, but he was booted for whatever reason and so he is fair game for accurate descriptions of his financial arrangements he has with IPM, if any. Inasmuch as he was responsible for many people investing in IPM at a far higher level than now, I feel it is a fascinating topic. Whenever it is raised a flurry of back and forth recriminations results, which means to me that where there is smoke there is fire. I do not know where the 'blower' is coming from, but he hints at large resources he can bring to bear against one, both physical and financial, I suspect that the content of all the e-mails he has sent to various people, if assembled and sent to SI, might just get his expungement realized, as such threats are expressly against the terms of use. Bill