Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Canadian Junior Resource Roundup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: El Canadiense who wrote (4126)	11/3/2017 3:36:52 AM
From: ayeyou	2 Recommendations Recommended By 22jt ogi Respond to of 4478

Yes them Aussie's seem to be used to counting profits by the tenth of a cent. The market there is a tough one to make headway in. DEG is a good one and with a good result from their ongoing exploration KAI.AX could be a big winner on a percentage gain basis. In my opinion Quintons statement re the same conglomerate means there is really only two possible origins of that gold bearing conglomerate being spread out over that big an area. One is the Hennigh Wits2.0 theory and the other is an ancient beach placer similar to but much bigger than the Nome Alaska placers. Either way the result is the same. Large quantities of gold spread over a huge area. They been mining Nome placers for well over 100 years and it just keeps giving up more and more gold. However Nome gold bearing area which is the largest beach placer known is only 2 miles wide by 10 miles long. The length of strike in Pilbarra is already 3 or 4 times that strike. One thing for sure it is a rare and unique deposit they are onto down there and it will be very interesting to see how it all plays out over the next year or so. mindat.org