Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rxbond who wrote (1036753)	11/3/2017 6:04:07 PM
From: James Seagrove	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Good point. Russia in effect financed the DNC. Hard to believe they preferred Hillary to an old commie like Col. Bernie Sanders.

To: rxbond who wrote (1036753)	11/4/2017 9:48:16 AM
From: RetiredNow	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Those are the kinds of questions a Special Prosecutor of Hillary should be asking? I'm still asking the question of why do we not have a Special Prosecutor for Hillary yet? The evidence that she's a criminal is so overwhelming. I tell my boys to pay particular attention when one person accuses another, because the accuser is often guilty of the thing he/she is accusing the other person of. I don't know why that is true, but it's something I've noticed a lot in my lifetime of dealing with people. Perhaps it is that people project onto others what they themselves don't want to admit about themselves. In Hillary's case, she spent a lot of time accusing Trump of inappropriate contact with Russia during the lead up to the election. It turns out that there is a mountain of evidence that she and the people in her orbit were doing precisely those things. The accuser is the guilty one.