SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (44060)11/8/2017 2:17:34 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
d[-_-]b

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360630
 
No I'm talking about automatic weapons. They are heavily restricted but not banned for private use.

So if they aren't banned why should bump stocks be banned? Why impose even tighter control on them than on automatic weapons?

Do you think bump-stocks should be as hard to get as a permit for an automatic gun?

I don't think they should be harder.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (44060)11/8/2017 7:21:03 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 360630
 
Steve, I think there is bi-partisan legislation proposed to eliminate bump-stocks. Two Rs and two ds.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News