SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (44148)11/8/2017 6:46:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 355564
 
How about just doing research independently? Not only with gun control, but with AGW?

Legitimate scientists would not support what has been (and is being) done in researching AGW. Part of it makes sense, but the conclusion are obviously not science. The great scientists of 100 years ago wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.



To: epicure who wrote (44148)11/8/2017 7:45:26 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 355564
 
Agreed. But I personally think technology might solve the problem. I think technology can void the 2'nd Amendment. At some point, anyone who deploys a gun will die instantly, and after a few examples (perhaps 1000's of examples?) the morons will realize the game is over.



To: epicure who wrote (44148)11/8/2017 7:57:45 PM
From: stsimon  Respond to of 355564
 
It's a hundred year problem. As rural areas continue to lose population to the cities they will also lose political power. This will take a long time, but at some point rural areas simply won't politically matter much.

Factory farms are already becoming quite automated. Humans won't be sitting in combines harvesting corn and soybeans. Robots will be tending the cattle, not cowboys.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News