Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Canadian Junior Resource Roundup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: caliche who wrote (4216)

11/9/2017 5:55:47 AM

From: ayeyou

Respond to of 4478

Well you made it a whole day on vacation without posting so at least its a start cal . In light of some of the great developments I dont know that I could have done any better. That SEA news from Iron Cap is outstanding. I plan to go and see if I can get a drill plan on those holes from their site. I noticed that Fronk tries to play down possibility of Iron Cap extending to Treaty Creek in that release but of course he would have reason for that. The MT survey will stand up and show the way here in my opinion.

It said the mineralization runs as deep as 3 kms there and goes all way from Iron Cap 7 kms to Copperbelle. Two of these last three SEA holes ended in mineralization even after hole 71 was a km down. I am now more eager than ever to see the results of TUD's last 23 holes at copperbelle. They only drilled to 700 meter depth so they may have a few holes open at depth but what I want to see is the copper grade increasing in the cores. If that copper grade starts picking up as they got further west from copperbelle it will verify my thoughts on Iron Cap and copperbelle being part of the same huge porphyry deposit. If that is the case it will be the biggest discovery in the triangle since Pretium found Brucejack . Couple ifs in there ,yes, but I think it will all prove out. That magnetotelluric survey system has proven to be absolutely accurate for both SEA and PVG and I believe is 100% accurate at Treaty Creek as well. Here is how that MT survey at Treaty looks , yellow is projected porphyry mineralization.....

This is from AMK site which by the way is excellent resource for Treaty Creek info they are talking about 2016 holes here but look how things have worked out....

The 2016 Iron Cap hole IC-16-62 is Seabridge’s most promising hole to date and confirms that the system continues north under the Johnston Ice Field. The entire focus of Seabridge’s 2017 KSM program is on the Iron Cap “given its exceptional grades and the possibility that it may extend to the north, west, and east” – Fronk 2017. Perhaps that’s why Fronk also stated of the 12 years of successful drilling on KSM “we believe (2017) could be one of our most productive”. Some of the holes planned in their recently announced 8,750m program will be drilled within 500m of the Treaty property border and will reach over 1,200m deep. As shown earlier, the MT survey on Treaty Creek (identical to the one that helped discover the Lower Iron Cap zone) suggests that the mineralization continues north, projected to extend NNE from the Iron Cap zone across the Treaty Creek boundary for 7 kilometers, under the West Nunutak all the way to near Treaty’s Orpiment zone.
If the MT survey on Treaty is accurate (as it has thus far proven to be) in indicating deposits of this scale, this hydrothermal system could host the largest concentration of metal value in the world.

Drill Hole ID	Total Depth (meters)	From (meters)	To (meters)	Interval (meters)	Gold (g/T)	Copper (%)	Silver (g/T)	Equivalent Grade
Drill Hole ID	Total Depth (meters)	From (meters)	To (meters)	Interval (meters)	Gold (g/T)	Copper (%)	Silver (g/T)	Gold (g/T)	Copper (%)
IC-17-71	1006.1 including	306.3	1006.1	699.8	0.87	0.51	2.4	1.72	1.07
IC-17-71	1006.1 including	511.4	697.7	186.3	1.49	0.74	3.6	2.73	1.69
IC-17-72	1329.4 including	400.0	1258.1	858.1	0.86	0.51	2.4	1.71	1.06
IC-17-72	1329.4 including	498.9	612.2	113.3	2.98	1.56	4.4	5.56	3.44
IC-17-73	603.4 including	224.0	603.4	379.4	0.33	0.35	4.8	0.96	0.59
IC-17-73	603.4 including	546.4	603.4	57.0	1.16	0.18	4.4	1.51	0.94