SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (645679)11/10/2017 10:11:19 AM
From: ig  Respond to of 793677
 
Well THAT explains it -- Moore was a DEMOCRAT in 1979! :>)



To: LindyBill who wrote (645679)11/10/2017 10:39:55 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793677
 
There is zero tolerance for even an innocent mistake when a man approaches a woman with the intent to have a relationship.

So what's happening? MGTOW. And now women are starting to bitch about that.



To: LindyBill who wrote (645679)11/10/2017 10:48:39 AM
From: Thehammer  Respond to of 793677
 
so much for equality



To: LindyBill who wrote (645679)11/10/2017 5:05:45 PM
From: bruwin1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Katelew

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793677
 
Obviously it is completely unacceptable when a man "handles" a woman in a most inappropriate and uninvited manner, and a woman does much the same to a man.

BUT it seems today that a woman, or man, only have to accuse someone of "sexual harassment" for such an accusation to be taken as a FACT !!

Surely there must be some degree of evidence, or admission by the accused, that such an uninvited action ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE ?? Because, if not, then surely it's one person's word against the other person, so who's to say who is lying or telling the truth ??

If a man is accused by a woman of sexual harassment, and he knows full well that she is lying through her teeth, for whatever reason, then I say he should SUE the hell out of her and make a serious case of DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER AGAINST HER .... at the very least ....