Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (29726)	1/9/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Bob Markley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Frank/CL/Austin: www3.techstocks.com

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (29726)	1/9/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Dave Bissett	Respond to of 35569

These developments being in our favor depend on IPM's costs, about which we haven't heard an official peep since Bateman said the recovery process they had been working with wasn't economical. I'm hoping that IPM is currently ahead of their 12-18 month time frame for feasibility and that their eventual statement on this will make the bookmark worthwhile. Dave

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (29726)	1/9/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Matt, <<Bookmark this page and re-visit it next Xmas. >> You know that I, as much as anyone here, wants to believe that we are going to be much higher by this time next year. After all, I am apparently one of the cheer leaders. IPM has done a fabulous job with the exposure and attention it has received. Great job with getting the financing and fund support that it has. There are many things that I like about the job they have done but there are deficiencies that either should be addressed or if they are being taken care of then a method to ensure that their share holders know about it. I would love to be calling around the world like I did when I was trying to find information out about IPM but that unfortunately has become financially impractical for me at this time. What avenue do the small share holders of IPM have to keep abreast of the companies activities, progress and/or set backs. The rumors of 1997 turned out to be more damaging then helpful to many, the company no longer returns E-mail and the company press releases are virtually impossible for a lamen such as myself to interpret. What we have here is a failure to communicate. IPM and the other dirts have been burdened more then most mining companies with explanations and progress reports but that is understandable IMO considering the nature of the beast. Chucklookingforanswers