Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (251504)	11/18/2017 8:02:44 AM
From: Goose94	Respond to of 313013

@hoover Full of shit for assays returns.

To: Rocket Red who wrote (251504)	11/18/2017 11:21:45 AM
From: ayeyou	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313013

He makes some legit points on NNA though which I guess is why you are attacking him. This question seemed particularly on spot.... @hoover @RocketRed You still didn't answer my question. If core photos are 13 cm (approx.) and the interesting mineralization covers 132 metres, why were there only 108 samples sent to the lab? 132/.13 is more than 1000 intervals. Please explain. Were 90% of them barren?