SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (45629)11/18/2017 1:52:45 PM
From: neolib1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Alex MG

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 358420
 
Dems are far more likely them Reps to agree to prosecute their own.

Why did Reps close ranks and vote for Trump despite the magnitude of his unfitness for office, while Dems split and voted for independents in sufficient numbers to allow Trump to win. That is the hallmark of conservatives vs liberals. Conservatives are bent on winning at all costs, their morals be damned. Liberals are not.

Again, only a really stupid person doesn't know that.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (45629)11/18/2017 3:12:32 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 358420
 
>> Based on what I'm reading on these threads, I'm the only one who has openly called for the prosecution of both GOP and Dem members and candidates. Every last one of you has instead chosen to be partisan in who you think should face the consequences. I am indiscriminate.

The problem with ALL these incidents is they were so long ago prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. GOP and Dem. And you can't prosecute people for non-crimes or where there is no evidence, even if the statute hasn't tolled.

So, I say, anyone who can be prosecuted ought to be. Rep. Dem. I don't give a shit.

But a lot of these claims are not criminal, but just adults behaving badly.

Perhaps women will feel empowered by all of it to speak out early if they believe they're abused. But there has to be real abuse, not just, "He tried to kiss me and I didn't want him to."



To: RetiredNow who wrote (45629)11/18/2017 10:06:58 PM
From: denizen48  Respond to of 358420
 
You are indiscriminate?who do you think on this thread believes that?

Maybe you do well good for you.