Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (45683)	11/18/2017 8:03:14 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 358212

>> Undressing a 14 year old is hard to mistake as something else. You know, I'm not going to try to defend Roy Moore because I think it is likely he did it. I haven't followed the story closely, but it does NOT seem ambiguous to me. I defend Trump solely because I see the accuser as the HRC campaign/DNC, NOT the women. HRC and the DNC have reached a level at which nothing surprises me. She would have killed to become president, and the DNC would have killed on her behalf. So, getting a few women to make this claim isn't that difficult. If they were to be questioned, one would need to ask whether these women were compensated by HRC or the DNC or other political organizations; this, we'll never know. And these women did NOT present strong cases on an individual basis. And for the most part, they melted back into private life after making a brief appearance, essentially, campaigning for HRC. Any of these accusers need to face questioning to be believed; however, in Franken's case, there is photographic evidence which, like it or not, forced him to admit the truth and politically, for him to apologize about it. Trump has admitted to being a womanizer, but I don't think there is credible evidence of any kind of assault.