SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (533)11/21/2017 1:56:55 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13775
 
I have found the interview on Youtube.

I believe the tax reform, at its core, is to entice the firms to bring home the cash pile https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-overseas-profits/ they have overseas.

Perhaps centering the discussion around this core issue won't draw too many CNN viewers?



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)11/21/2017 4:18:00 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13775
 
So many people in the Trump administration are both exceptionally intelligent and have the fortitude to manage their wholly unsuitable boss.

Rex Tillerson, secretary of state, has called Trump a moron, while at a recent dinner with Oracle executives, national security advisor described Trump as an "idiot" and a "dope" who "has the intelligence of a Kindergardener".

General Kelley makes the same comments with his face as Trump goes off the rails in public, taking a deep breath and shaking his head.

I'm certain these are the most challenging jobs these men have ever had in their lives. These guys had reached a level in their careers where they dealt almost exclusively with the brightest and most successful people and they're now dealing with a person with severely limited capabilities but elected to a very responsible position - reminiscent of Emperor Caligula allegedly making his favorite horse a Consul in the Senate.

I know it makes these men painfully aware of, as they say, "the failings of democracy, except in comparison with every other form of government."



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)12/1/2017 1:23:13 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13775
 
Dr. Pangloss chart




To: John Pitera who wrote (533)12/1/2017 5:07:13 PM
From: Elroy Jetson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Fiscally Conservative

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13775
 
Trump has changed parties, careers and wives, but his estranged relationship with truth is remarkably consistent. “I don’t think it has evolved,” journalist Susan Mulcahy said. “I don’t think he’s changed much. What you’re seeing now is what you saw 30 years ago.”

In her 1988 book documenting her time at Page Six during a period when Trump’s star was ascendant, Mulcahy devotes half a chapter to the future president’s fondness for falsehoods, be it about anything from his real estate deals to whether he was meeting with Richard Nixon.

“No matter how well wired a gossip columnist is, there are those who will try to snip those wires,” Mulcahy wrote at the time. “Of all the wire cutters I’ve encountered, Donald Trump carries the sharpest instruments.”

Not that she realized Trump was a liar at first.

“It happened gradually,” she said of the realization. “I wrote about him because he was this oversized figure. New York is a city of great characters and Donald Trump is – I hate to say this – a great character. I covered him but as time went on, I got snarkier.”

And though over time she pared back her coverage of him, to some extent, ignoring Trump was easier said than done.

The particulars of her Trump stories are damning.

After a source tipped her off to a meeting between Trump and Nixon and she called to confirm it, for instance, Trump didn’t just evade the question: he totally denied it. “‘Nope, didn’t have a meeting with Nixon,’” she recalled him saying. “Then,” she added, “Nixon’s office confirmed it.”

Donald Trump attends the opening of his new casino, the Taj Mahal, in Atlantic City, New Jersey, in 1989



It was an ironic place to find oneself, post-Watergate: getting stories confirmed by a confirmed crook. But Nixon was apparently more honest than the guy he was meeting with. Making the lie more ridiculous, Mulcahy recalled, was the fact that the meeting was, by all reports, relatively innocuous – Nixon was looking for an apartment and thought Trump might help.

Why lie about that? What difference does it make?” she asked of Trump’s denial.

“He has become so used to getting away with everything that the fact that he lies about everything clearly doesn’t bother him: he knows it’s going to roll off his back,” she said.

Another time, when she and a colleague went to Trump Tower to interview Trump, he told her nothing was happening with a real estate deal she had been writing about. The next morning, the New York Times ran a big story about the Lincoln West development, citing a conversation with Trump the same day he told Mulcahy there was no story.

“‘I had a deal with the Times,’” she recalled Trump telling her in her book. “‘I was going to call you today and tell you about it.’”

Even now, some 30 years later, Mulcahy is still stunned by the audacity of the lie.

“People skirt the truth, they play games, they don’t call you back, but the way he lied I had never experienced before,” she said. “It was so over the top and it was so arrogant. He’s a narcissist beyond description. Every day I get up, look at the paper and can’t believe he’s president. It is such a joke to me.”

But given his background and training from the late Roy Cohn – the reviled but highly successful defense attorney who rose to political prominence as a legal adviser to the late Senator Joseph McCarthy – perhaps she shouldn’t have been surprised.

Mulcahy frequently interacted with Cohn at Page Six and though she didn’t exactly relish the relationship, next to Trump, he seemed like a paragon of truth-telling.

With Trump, “you had to double and triple check everything”, she said. “If it was a good story, it was worth doing the extra work, but half the time it would turn out to be a lie. Roy didn’t lie like that.”

Even before 2016, Mulcahy assumed Trump was running in much the same way he’d run or threatened to run before: as a publicity stunt to promote his new casino or circus act du jour. She had plenty of company in being surprised by the outcome. “I think he’s shocked he won,” she said.

Faster-moving news cycles haven’t curbed Trump’s propensity for lying, either.

“Everything he says has to be checked and it’s very difficult in the age of the internet,” Mulcahy said. “When I was writing you could have an hour or two before your deadline. Now you’ve got to publish it immediately, if he says something outrageous. But everything still has to be checked – everything.

Mulcahy, who gleaned her insights into reporting on Trump the hard way, does have some thoughts for those charged with covering the president today.

“Donald Trump should be treated like a very, very bad child in a preschool. Like the kid in preschool who really wants attention, so he throws his excrement against the wall? That’s Trump on Twitter.

“Bury the absurd outbursts and cover what is really happening. Don’t cover his personality and his statements on Twitter, because they’re ridiculous.”

Mulcahy said she wished there were a way to cover the actions of Trump’s administration without covering Trump himself. “He would lose interest in the whole thing, as soon as it wasn’t all about him,” she said. “He would lose interest in being president if you just covered those actions.”

For instance, she said, it was no coincidence that when hurricanes were pounding the Gulf, Trump was busy tweeting about players kneeling at NFL games. “He wants people not to pay attention to the fact that his government is not doing a good job of hurricane cleanup,” she said. “He’s very good at redirecting attention.”

She is damning about what she see as the president’s narcissism.

“He’s so excited to turn the TV on – it’s Donald everywhere and that’s all he wants,” she said. “He didn’t get into office with a plan, like: I want to accomplish these things. He just wanted to win – just like he wanted to make a major real estate deal and get the most tax abatements or whatever.”

She added: “Trump has no policies or theories, just a desperate, endless need for attention.”

Thirty years after she first began dealing with Trump, her observations remain apt.

“I certainly did not envision my comments about his lying to become relevant in this context so many years later,” she said. “I thought he would be a lounge act in Atlantic City about now. If so, he’d be happier, and the rest of us would have much less to worry about.” - theguardian.com



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)12/6/2017 11:51:56 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13775
 
John, What if the Saudi princes arrests caused Bitcoin to skyrockets.

Consider
The princes hold huge amount of wealth abroad.
They were arrested to be shaken down so the MFS (the new strong man) gets his hands into that wealth to the Saudi treasury

Saudi prince freed after reportedly paying more than $1 billion

Saudi Prince Miteb bin Abdullah has been released after paying authorities more than $1 billion for his freedom
cnbc.com

In some cases, the Saudi government had been seeking to appropriate as much as 70 percent of a suspect's wealth, the Financial Times reported in mid-November. The settlements have the potential to channel hundreds of billions of dollars - allegedly accrued through corruption – back into depleted state funds.

If you are the family of these arrested princes, plus the ones who had not been arrested but could be as they might have got the message.
What would you do?

Before MFS orders a freeze of the assets, the princes tell their bankers to move the funds into Bitcoins to become untraceable.

Bitcoin became a sellers market



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)12/12/2017 10:01:36 PM
From: elmatador3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Elroy Jetson
gg cox
John Pitera

  Respond to of 13775
 
The Force Behind Bitcoin’s Meteoric Rise: Millions of Asian Investors
Retail investors, mostly in Asia, are pushing the price of bitcoin to new heights
By Steven Russolillo in Hong Kong and

Eun-Young Jeong in Seoul

Updated Dec. 12, 2017 9:46 p.m. ET
152 COMMENTS

Behind bitcoin’s stunning rise lies a new force in global financial markets: millions of individual Asian investors.

Despite the attention focused on the launch of bitcoin futures in the U.S. last weekend, the center of gravity for trading the virtual currency, measured by volumes, has been in the East—starting in China, before shifting earlier this year to Japan and recently to South Korea as the latest hot spot.

Unlike past financial frenzies—such as the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, when U.S. retail investors only piled in at the later stages of the rally—individual investors have been first to the party, fueling bitcoin’s 1,600% rise this year.

“Bitcoin is one of the few markets we’ve ever had in history where you’ve seen these astronomical gains around the world and the retail investors in Asia are the ones driving it,” said Chris Weston, chief market strategist at IG Group, one of the world’s largest online trading platforms. “It feels like this whole thing is being driven by the average Joe who isn’t nearly as financially literate as a professional fund manager.”

Various forces have stoked Asia’s bitcoin fever. While individual wealth has been growing in recent years, particularly in China and South Korea, lucrative investment opportunities can be hard to find, with property markets expensive and stock markets fully valued.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that Asians are more comfortable with the concept of virtual currencies such as bitcoin, particularly younger people who have grown up in a world of e-commerce and mobile payments.

China last year made up the bulk of trading volume before regulators clamped down. But by the end of November, Japan, South Korea and Vietnam accounted for nearly 80% of bitcoin trading activity globally, according to research firm CryptoCompare, while U.S. trading was about one-fifth of the volume. In the past few weeks, the U.S. share of the overall total has increased.

While the numbers can fluctuate significantly daily, South Korea at one point last week accounted for as much as a quarter of bitcoin trading activity, exceeding that of the U.S., according to Coinhills, a data firm that tracks digital currencies. South Korea has a population of about 51 million, compared with 323 million in the U.S.

“Asia in general has a lot of interest in trading cryptocurrencies…[They] are the cool new thing that young people are excited about” said Vitalik Buterin, the creator of another type of cryptocurrency called ethereum, in a recent interview in Seoul.

Lee Sang-chul, 32 years old, is one of the millions of South Koreans who have become enamored with bitcoin. Mr. Lee, who runs a car-detailing shop in the southern port city of Busan, invested 100 million South Korean won (about $92,000) into the virtual currency in October, a decision he describes as life-changing thanks to the gains he has made.

The virtual currency bitcoin continues surging to new highs as a frenzy of investors get in on the action. WSJ's Paul Vigna explains what you need to know, and how to invest should you want to join the mania. Photo: Alexander Hotz/The Wall Street Journal.

“Before bitcoin, I’d be at my shop from morning to evening. Now, I close shop when I have an appointment or leave early,” said Mr. Lee. He has hired two people at his shop since he started investing in bitcoin and bought his wife an expensive Chanel handbag for their wedding anniversary.

“My goal is to accumulate as many bitcoin as I can,” Mr. Lee said, adding that he expects the virtual currency to replace standard currencies in the future.

In Hong Kong, cryptocurrency fans gathered on a recent Friday evening at what was advertised as a “Bitcoin Bubble Bash.” The Bitcoin Association of Hong Kong organized the meetup, with BitMEX, a trading platform, helping pay for pizza, wraps, beer and wine to celebrate “the most successful year of bitcoin history yet (again!),” according to the event invitation. Nearly 200 people registered, with attendees including teachers, equity traders and insurance brokers.

“I’ve doubled my money. It’s only going up. I’m getting rich so quick,” said one person who attended the event.

It is people like these across Asia who have propelled bitcoin’s prices this year. Analysts reckon traditional Wall Street professionals won’t become the market’s main driving force for some time.

“It’s the first ever bankerless bubble,” Joshua Brown, chief executive of New York investment-advisory firm Ritholtz Wealth Management, wrote on his blog this month. “There’s never been a phenomenon like this where the general public beats the ‘big money’…We have a full-blown mania on our hands and Wall Street is still at the drawing board.”

Bitcoin’s popularity in South Korea has led to the cryptocurrency often trading at a higher price there than elsewhere. When bitcoin surged past $17,000 last week for the first time, according to CoinDesk, a research site that distributes the most widely quoted price across the cryptospace, it hit almost $25,000 on Bithumb, South Korea’s biggest cryptocurrency exchange. Two other South Korean exchanges, Coinone and Korbit, also displayed prices well above $20,000. Those spreads have since narrowed.

“Every market had its own local rules and that creates all different types of discrepancies,” said Cedric Jeanson, founder and chief executive of BitSpread, a bitcoin-focused hedge fund.

The bitcoin frenzy in Asia has triggered a backlash from regulators and politicians. China has already this year banned cryptocurrency exchanges and initial coin offerings, a form of fundraising that uses cryptocurrencies.

Late Monday, Hong Kong’s market regulator warned that some unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges could be illegally offering futures and other cryptocurrency-related investment products.

Earlier this month, Pan Gongsheng, deputy governor of China’s central bank, warned investors about bitcoin at an event in Shanghai. “There’s only one thing we can do—watch it from the bank of a river,” he said. “One day you’ll see bitcoin’s dead body float away in front of you.”

South Korean Prime Minister Lee Nak-yon has also sounded the alarm. “If we let things continue, I feel that it will lead to some serious distorted or pathological phenomenon,” he said in a speech last month.

The chairman of South Korea’s Financial Services Commission, Choi Jong-ku, on Monday told reporters the government wouldn’t officially authorize any cryptocurrency exchanges or introduce bitcoin futures trading.

“Too many people have jumped in to invest without knowing the basics,” said Josephin Jung, a former teacher turned bitcoin trader in her mid-40s, who regularly gives private lectures on bitcoin in Seoul. “And too many are getting cheated in the process.”

—Kwanwoo Jun contributed to this article.

Write to Steven Russolillo at steven.russolillo@wsj.com and Eun-Young Jeong at Eun-Young.Jeong@wsj.com

Appeared in the December 13, 2017, print edition as 'Bitcoin Lures Asia Investors.'



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)1/3/2018 11:43:52 AM
From: elmatador1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John Pitera

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13775
 
The world has never been more heavily invested in US assets — previous examples would suggest this is a flashing warning signal that a deep and prolonged bout of US dollar weakness is on its way.

Record high US asset investment hit the dollar
https://www.ft.com/video/9da112b0-df63-4b49-b808-f6cc80a226dd

The world has never been more heavily invested in US assets. The FT's Miles Johnson asks if this a warning signal that a deep and prolonged bout of greenback weakness is on its way



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)1/22/2018 1:12:25 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13775
 
The Global Economy Is Doing Just Fine, But the Davos Elite Is Worried

By Simon Kennedy and Enda Curran

January 22, 2018, 3:01 AM GMT+3 Updated on January 22, 2018, 5:13 PM GMT+3
Link to see the charts
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/what-shiller-stiglitz-and-rogoff-are-worrying-about-at-davos

China, debt, protectionsm, Trump all seen as threats to growth

International Monetary Fund to update economic outlook Monday

If things seem too good to be true in the global economy, they probably are.

That’s according to some of the investors, Nobel laureates and academics attending the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which kicks off on Monday.

The fastest global growth since the start of the decade and strong forecasts for corporate earnings appear to be creating near perfect conditions for many investors, with stock buyers’ optimism hitting an eight-year high. Equities worldwide are already up about $3.4 trillion in 2018, with gains continuing even as major gauges flash overbought signals. Bitcoin is on a rollercoaster.

“Historically the stock market tends to affect the mood in Davos,’’ said BlackRock Inc. Vice Chairman Philipp Hildebrand, who will be among the 3,000 visitors to the Alpine ski resort. “So if things stay as they are, I expect the mood will be good.’’

Stronger MomentumThe IMF sees global growth accelerate to the fastest pace in seven years

The question is, can things stay as they are? Not all of those in Davos are sure they can.

“We are complacent at this moment,” said Robert Shiller, the Nobel laureate from Yale University whose research covers the rise and fall of asset prices. He goes as far as to say there are potential parallels between today and 1929, when a plunge in stocks helped trigger the Great Depression.

Any correction would be “probably not as bad as 1929, but it could be disruptive,” Shiller said in an interview.

More upbeat is Harvard University professor Kenneth Rogoff, who argues the “long shadow of the financial crisis” is finally fading, so “growth will continue to outperform.”

The International Monetary Fund on Monday used Davos as a stage to update its economic outlook. It raised its forecast for expansion this year and next to 3.9 percent, but Managing Director Christine Lagarde also warned against complacency.

While the meeting’s forecasting track record is patchy, delegates occasionally get the big calls right. Back in 2007, global growth seemed solid and stocks were soaring, yet
former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said that “it’s worth remembering that markets were very upbeat in the early summer of 1914.” Nouriel Roubini of New York University predicted a “hard landing.”

The financial crisis proved both correct. Here, according to some who will be in Davos, are the potential threats to the current outlook.

CHINA
The world’s second-largest economy surprised on the upside through 2017, but is beginning to show renewed signs of cooling. A plan to reduce risk in the financial system has slowed credit growth, but the country’s debt pile, equivalent to about 264 percent of gross domestic product in 2017, remains a concern.

How the Chinese authorities rein in borrowing without tipping the economy over will be one of the year’s biggest challenges.

“I think of China as probably being the epicenter if we got hit by a global recession,” said Rogoff.

GLOBAL DEBT
It’s not just China. Global debt rose to a record $233 trillion in the third quarter of 2017, more than $16 trillion higher from the end of 2016, according to the Institute of International Finance. Private non-financial sector debt hit all-time highs in Canada, France, Hong Kong, South Korea, Switzerland and Turkey.

As interest rates begin to increase, borrowers might start to feel pain even though the ratio of debt-to-GDP has fallen as growth accelerated.

“We’ve seen the world leverage up,” said Tim Adams, the institute’s president who will be in Davos. “It’s been an incredibly low rate environment which I suspect is going to change.”

INTEREST RATES
The trigger for the end to that environment could be an inflationary surge that forces central banks to dump their piecemeal approach to reversing the emergency stimulus of the past decade.

With economies expanding so quickly, commodities prices are picking up and manufacturing gauges are pointing to supply constraints. The U.S. also just slashed taxes, and some big employers, like Walmart Inc., are beginning to lift wages.

“We could start to see inflation rising more than most people think in financial markets which means the Fed and other central banks will have to raise rates sooner and faster,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Markit. “That could rattle things up.”

Rogoff said the “biggest vulnerability” in markets would be a sudden reversal in the trend toward lower inflation-adjusted borrowing costs.

PROTECTIONISMThe trade issues that failed to flare up last year could do so in 2018. President Donald Trump has threatened to tear up the North American Trade Agreement and a pact with South Korea. There’s also a U.S. investigation into allegations that China steals American know-how, and Trump warns he might slap tariffs on Chinese goods, especially steel.

“Once there is a major breakdown in trade there is a race to the bottom,” said Dominic Barton, managing director of McKinsey & Co. “It’s important the fragile system we now have continues. We shouldn’t underestimate the potential for disruption.”

Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz, a member of the WEF’s Executive Committee, said “there is still a danger that the multilateral trading systems could break down as we know it because there are a lot of risks on the horizon.”

North Korea is saber rattling amid Kim Jong Un’s quest for a nuclear-tipped missile. Uncertainty lingers across much of the Middle East as tensions grow between the U.S. and Iran. Syria remains a tinderbox. In Europe, there is still no new government in Germany and Britain’s outlook is obscured by Brexit.

“If you could isolate the economics from the politics you would be optimistic about what is happening, but unfortunately you can never isolate the economics from the politics,” said Nobel laureate Christopher Pissarides, who teaches at the London School of Economics.

TRUMPTrump makes his debut in Davos this year, days after comments that took aim at African nations and the U.K. He still plans to ban travelers from predominantly Muslim countries, build a wall along the Mexico border and has taken an aggressive approach to North Korea.

“The most significant political risk is the United States,” said Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz of Colombia University. “Uncertainty is bad for the global economy.”

— With assistance by Jeanna Smialek, Catherine Bosley, Vonnie Quinn, Adrian Leung, and Dani Burger



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)2/9/2018 2:02:03 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13775
 
Latin American markets on Friday were mostly unfazed by this week's global stock rout, supported by expectations of strong global growth.
Key Latin American stock indexes and currencies at 1720 GMT: Stock indexes
reuters.com



To: John Pitera who wrote (533)8/1/2018 9:17:38 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13775
 
The Oil And Gas Boom Sends U.S. GDP Soaring

Higher oil prices this year boosted U.S. oil production, and the U.S. oil industry played a large part in America’s impressive second quarter economic growth—the fastest growth since the third quarter of 2014.

Private investment in petroleum and natural gas jumped to US$123.7 billion in Q2 2018 from US$103.8 billion in Q1, and up from the US$90.5 billion investment in the second quarter of 2017, BEA figures show

The Oil And Gas Boom Sends U.S. GDP Soaring
By Tsvetana Paraskova - Jul 30, 2018, 6:00 PM CDT
Higher oil prices this year boosted U.S. oil production, and the U.S. oil industry played a large part in America’s impressive second quarter economic growth—the fastest growth since the third quarter of 2014.

Real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) rose at an annual rate of 4.1 percent in the second quarter of 2018, according to the ‘advance’ estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on Friday. The first quarter of this year, by comparison, saw real GDP increase by 2.2 percent.

The increase in real GDP in the second quarter of 2018 reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, nonresidential fixed investment, federal government spending, and state and local government spending that were partly offset by negative contributions from private inventory investment and residential fixed investment, BEA said.

Nonresidential private fixed investment in mining exploration, shafts, and wells jumped to US$129.4 billion this past quarter, from US$109.2 billion in the first quarter of 2018. On an annual basis, the rise in investment in exploration, shafts, and wells soared by 97 percentfrom the second quarter of 2017. This surge was the second-highest annual gain on record, with the largest booked in 1987, according to Bloomberg calculations.

The ‘mining exploration’ subcategory includes all types of mining, but petroleum and natural gas account for 96 percent of it.

Private investment in petroleum and natural gas jumped to US$123.7 billion in Q2 2018 from US$103.8 billion in Q1, and up from the US$90.5 billion investment in the second quarter of 2017, BEA figures show.
Meanwhile, U.S. oil production continues to set records. Over the past two weeks, American crude oil production has hit 11 million bpd after having sustained production of 10.9 million bpd over the previous four weeks, according to EIA figures.

In the biggest U.S. shale regions, production is expected to jump to 7.470 million bpd in August, up by 143,000 bpd from an estimated 7.327 million bpd in July, EIA’s latest Drilling Productivity Report says.

Not only is U.S. shale production growing, but the shale industry as a whole is expected to become profitable this year for the first time in history, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency (IEA).

“Several companies expect positive free cash flow based on an assumed oil price well below the levels seen so far in 2018 and there are clear indications that bond markets and banks are taking a more positive attitude to the sector, following encouraging financial results for the first quarter,” IEA Senior Programme Officer Alessandro Blasi and IEA Energy Investment Analyst Yoko Nobuoka wrote in an analysis last week.

“On this basis, we estimate that the shale sector as a whole is on track to achieve, for the first time in its history, positive free cash flow in 2018. This result is all the more impressive given the context of rising investment,” IEA’s analysts say, noting that there are downside risks associated with above-ground constraints such as the Permian takeaway capacity bottlenecks, and competition from other sources of oil.

Regarding the U.S. economic growth, some economists doubt that the pace from the second quarter can be sustained.

“Personal consumption would need to keep up with this impressive pace to see a solid second half,” Ian Lyngen at BMO Capital Markets told CNBC.

S&P Global—which had expected the U.S. economy to have grown by 3.9 percent in Q2—sees growth likely slowing down closer to 3 percent in the second half of this year, “as financial conditions have tightened a bit (short-term rates are higher, the dollar exchange rate is stronger, stock prices are range bound with an uptick in volatility, and interest rate spreads are slowly rising, aside from Treasuries), taking some momentum away from growth.”

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com