Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (46564)	11/26/2017 7:53:43 PM
From: lucky_limey	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 358409

I think "disallow" is your word,,, not mine I said "If a Mexican wants to send his kid to a Catholic School - then the Govt should not object on religious grounds." The govt demonstrates its objections on religious grounds by not releasing education funding. earmarked to that student.

To: combjelly who wrote (46564)	11/26/2017 8:28:07 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358409

>> You do realize there is a big difference between not disallowing religious schools and not paying for them? There IS a big difference. For sure, government should not be in the business of running religious schools. That's a personal thing, and taxpayers ought not be paying to operate Catholic schools or other religious institutions. OTOH, families who send their children to those schools ought not be paying to operate public schools, either. If, some year, they move their kids to public schools, they ought to have to pay the taxes to support them. That makes pretty good sense to me -- you pay for the schools your kids use. Maybe a negotiated solution, if need be. But fairness is a good thing.