Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Canadian Junior Resource Roundup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ayeyou who wrote (4435)	12/1/2017 12:33:33 PM
From: ralfph	Respond to of 4478

You got banned for that? Strikes me as a pm reminder to coach your words and maybe a one day ban if you insisted on repeating it. want to bet "you are talking out of your nether regions" is ok? Give it some thought, but who is more important you, your friends on SI or the soup nazi?

To: ayeyou who wrote (4435)	12/1/2017 12:43:03 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Respond to of 4478

Actually, the whole ban list for the ZEN thread makes for interesting reading ... siliconinvestor.com

To: ayeyou who wrote (4435)	12/1/2017 3:34:25 PM
From: kidl	2 Recommendations Recommended By ayeyou ralfph Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4478

No doubt, administrative bias is alive and well on SI. I actually had a post ready a few days ago addressing this very issue. I let it sit over night and in the morning I deleted the draft. Had I posted it, I would have probably been banned from SI for good. The truth is, I don’t want to be banned from SI for one very simple reason. The alternatives in terms of investment “chat sites” are actually far worse. My approach to all of this ... Watching the input while limiting the output. The resident “gangsters” are well known. Trading against them is much more productive then arguing with them.