Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (35243)	1/9/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Joe Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Well he would be just as responsible in the opposite direction.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (35243)	1/10/1998 11:03:00 AM
From: Michael P. Weber	Respond to of 55532

Al, The agreement is not in jeopordy and don't let them imply that it is! The fact of the matter is that they have also got the towns blessing to add another waterline to the 2nd expansion that's now planned. Why would they do that if it was in jeopordy? These guys will say anything! Just don't believe it...it's all propaganda! GOT WATER!! Mike

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (35243)	1/10/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<<<JM: Suppose Mike had been here spending all of his time..pushing the stock. Would you say that he would be doing the right thing? I am curious, because to me, it is just the other side of the coin. al>>> Al-len, Suppose Mike or another broker wandered onto a thread where derogatory BS was being posted by a large group of individuals who held a short position in a stock. And let's say that this group was relying on lies and speculation that directly contradicted publically observable facts. Let's say that these short were saying the company had no operations, when verifible information and pictures showed quantities of product being shipped and sold, workers smiling happily as they go about their work... etc. And let's suppose that this broker, again claiming no long position in the stock, presented hard evidence that disputed the Short-sellers claims. This group of shorts then start accusing him of being a paid promoter for the company without having any evidence of that fact. They just want to accuse him of it because his evidence and opinions are contrary to their's and the vested interest they have in the stock going down. Basically, Al-len... there is very little difference here. You and others have a vested interest in facilitating the passing on of misrepresentive information because it is in your vested interest and you hope to have some other party decide your right and come in and buy out your positions. And if you doubt me, then quickly tell me where and how I can purchase any of the products produced by RMIL or RMCW. I have a feeling that neither yourself or any other Hypster of RMIL out here will be able to tell me. You know that the only card that this company has to play is the "short squeeze". Have you pondered the plethora of scenarios where private deals can be "cut" to bail out any shorts while locking in profits for holders of large quantities of shares??? All of this while the unknowing Cartel and Cavalry shareholders diligently await the fulfillment of a short squeeze..... And given the history of credibility surrounding this company, do you really have total faith in management to protect your shareholder "value"?? We'll see. Just something to think about. Regards, Ron