Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (136968)	12/1/2017 10:59:59 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217617

A. Why did I know you would respond to I post I direct to elmat? I would be beside myself knowing for a moment you believed in my toss-away take, but for the truth that I have some steaming dumpling in front of me requiring immediate attention. B. ... and so I chose to waste your time by the preceding post to elmat One way or another, doesn’t matter which way. Both of you are too predictable. It is good that you agreed with elmat’s faulty-logic post. C. Elmat is hot-headed. Love it.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (136968)	12/1/2017 11:24:49 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217617

Today was the day we show TJ for what he is: Not to be taken serious. You have your way not to take TJ serious. I have mine. But there are a few people here who take him serious. I don't call people idiots. I let my analysis prove it. TJ has, reached MQ level when he was shown his pants down he would say: I was joking. But we know his train of thought. He was deadly serious. I don't have a problem with people taking TJ serious, I just don't want people insulting the intelligence of the ones who have it.