To: Alomex who wrote (7515 ) 1/10/1998 9:43:00 AM From: soup Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213173
>Which illustrates perfectly how severely delussional some Apple followers are.< Lighten up, dude. > I called this stock down all the way from $40 to $13, but in soup's little fantasy-world, Apple has done great all this years.< Well, I think I enjoyed using Apple *products* a lot more than the DOS/Win 3.1/'95 users I know. > In his world of fairies ...< You leave my fairies out of this! >... loyal customers and advanced operating systems that are *not upgraded in eight years*... < So, the OS8 upgrade *didn't* account for 33% of all OS sales in 1997, Huh... Huh? >I'm a contrarian indicator. I'm sure you have plenty of money on that World.< I was going to add a ":)" to my "put" comment, but I thought you'd get the joke without it. >On the real one, which is the one the rest of us inhabit, I was bearish and you were bullish. The stock moved from $40 to $13. ... < And you've gotten filthy rich by backing up that opinion with shorts and puts? >Admitting your error seems to be above you ...< Assuming, I'm deleriously "right" now about what's going on with AAPL company/products/stock, having been bullish for so long does indeed makes me de facto "wrong" (regardless of what happens in the future.) [Off-topic: What I was really dumb about was my overweighting of emerging markets last year. Ouch.] However in my defense, I paraphrase Peter Lynch -- "All my best ideas seemed to work out in the third and fourth years." My current perception of events as they are unfolding dictates that a) I hold a core position long-term, b) take some profits on short covering spikes, c) add to my position on news-less weakness. soup