Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Aussies who wrote (20561)	12/5/2017 2:29:58 PM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By Edwinder12 Respond to of 22811

Don't worry about Zen you know AE will get the money no problem you have enough to worry about on your own. Chiefy says it's going to be a long time before anything is settled in Quebec if it ever is. I'd get out of there with a few bucks left if you can, 5 cents coming. But thanks for worrying about Zen anyway. Actually, I am saying the opposite! There can be no conflict, Social Acceptability has to be defined or Quebec will lose any chance for exploration. If you can punch all the holes, meet all the enviro issues, and lose the ability to an undefined "Social Acceptability Clause" then who would ever consider on taking a chance on a mine in Quebec? So they no doubt will create Social Acceptability People to determine exactly what it means. Because at this point NIMBY is a criteria for Social Acceptability, why? Because its not excluded, and not defined anywhere. So could a community determine a Hydro Tower is not Socially Acceptable because of its height and stop the entire hydro line? What Quebec has not done is define what is Social Acceptability and what criterion is evaluated to assess the merits of either a complaint or acceptance.