Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1041644)	12/5/2017 9:01:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578531

Brumar, The wording doesn't require any doctors decree or anything. Just that the VP and a majority of the Cabinet sign a declaration. The history of the 25th amendment was clear. It was to clarify the procedures for succession in case of the president becoming incapacitated. Every single example in history of a president becoming incapacitated has been due to medical reasons. There has never been a case where a president was arbitrarily declared "incapacitated" simply because a majority think he's an asshole. I shouldn't have to explain this to you, but you are clearly stretching the original intentions of the 25th amendment and trying to parse words in ways a shyster lawyer would. Tenchusatsu