SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard P. who wrote (22867)1/10/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33344
 
Thanks Rick. I hope the article is accurate.

Bob



To: Richard P. who wrote (22867)1/11/1998 4:04:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman  Respond to of 33344
 
Richard, thanks for the TSMC link. I can just hear CPQ telling CYRX, "Let PB have all the 220MHz chips. We'll announce our PB-killing home PC using your TMSC 266MHz GXm and knock off HP with a Cayenne desktop in time for back-to-school sales. Meanwhile, we have a ton of cheap K6s to get rid of."

Craig



To: Richard P. who wrote (22867)1/11/1998 4:18:00 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33344
 
Rick,

THere seems to be a lot of conflicting info around. If Chris' report is right, Cyrix is producing GXm at 200 MHz with .35u process and higher than 200 MHz with .30u process. Does this make any sense to you? Why come up with layout for .35u process if it is going to be used for such a limited production run? If .30u 220 MHz version is around the corner, why bother with .35u process?

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News