Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35298)	1/10/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The word soon has lost it's meaning when it comes to this company.

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35298)	1/10/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Rich_1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Michael, why is Ron sounding so desperate? We shareholders have patience and know what's in the cooky jar. It should be a great week for us. Rich_1

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35298)	1/10/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

No Michael... I am saying that it hasn't happened. or maybe you have conveniently forgotten how the money was supposed to be injected into RMCW in November, then December 1st. And then it was reported out that the money was in country and scheduled to be transferred no later than December 24th. Now we have seen the amount reduced by 50% and not likely to occur before Jan 30th. It seems to me that you have already "bet" on this kind of information in the past and should save your money. You likely have enough at risk in your stock position in RMIL. Or go out and buy yourself a stiff drink and ponder RMIL's history of credibility. You all have a great weekend... Actually, anyone here remember the cartoon where Wiley E. Coyote, after a long day of being pummeled by the protective Sheepdog, finally find both of them punching out at the same timeclock?? Kinda getting to be like that around here... :0) Regards, Ron

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35298)	1/10/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: michael d kugler	Respond to of 55532

Michael, I have been reading your posts regarding RMCW. One of the things which you have not mentioned was that the original lease was conditioned upon RMCW building a plant, and creating some much needed jobs, within two years. That didn't happen. Now I'm not saying that Ten Sleep won't allow another agrement to be drafted, but if you want to be factual, you should have brought that up. Also, because the newly filed 8-K effectively says the merger has not been consummated, RMCW is still a private company. And as a private company, they can say anything they want to, and not be subject to the same responsibility for their statements to which a public company can be held. The last time I checked they had not filed for a building permit. It may be difficult to procure, if the property taxes have not been paid, as has been reported here.