SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: anyer who wrote (6589)1/10/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Sycamore  Respond to of 11888
 
"<<People thought Chevron was crazy 5 yrs. ago and now they want to emulate. Opportunity and profit rewardeth the bold.>>"

Anyer, Experiences teach us that this is always the case. The visionaries, risk takers and optimists LEAD while the pessimists and naysayers watch, then FOLLOW.

I didn't include the refinery in the comparison and I may differ with many people who are long the stock on this view, but without the oil or the money that will be generated from the deal, I find it difficult to believe that the refinery could support itself and make it as successful and profitable. AIPC is just too deep into the money on this Kasakstan deal.

Guess, we just have to keep our eyes and ears open. I'm monitoring the warrants more closely for hints. I'm excited for the next 30 days.

Goodluck to us all, sycamore



To: anyer who wrote (6589)1/10/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: taxikid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11888
 
exactly how is the cist of production lowere when there is no way to transport it? this is part of the product production costs..
while oil near a company owned pipeline or refinery here in usa may
be expensive for personnel taxes and any other things added.. transporting oil by truck etc means there has to be an inroad or transportation network which i am afraid there is not much of in kaz..
good luck
taxi