Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (44721)	1/10/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

Did I miss something? I sense a distrubance in the FORCE. The content of the messages on this thread has very subtly changed. Is it that word has leaked out that RMIL has launched a hostle takeover attempt for INTC??? This would be a clear violation of 10b-5. The Duke. jeez, I just realized that this message ITSELF might be a violation of 10b-5 or atleast 15usc2A 77q so I am immediatley going to have it deleted.

To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (44721)	1/10/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Dulane U. Ponder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

First, let me offer you an apology for taking as personal affront political views to which I do not ascribe. I also wish to apologize for then responding to you in an insulting manner simply because I flew off the handle. On occasion, social and political commentary with which I agree has been posted and then ridiculed by those who disagree in the same mindless fashion as my own knee-jerk reply. I like to think I believe in the freedom of expression, but sadly have not been a proponent of that belief here. As to sweeping generalizations, on re-examining the content of your posts, I find I am again in error and that you cite many good facts and make sensible assumptions. As to the chip chat remark, I suppose I find it often to be repetitive and not always addressed to the issues of investing. I can only say that I have such a reading load that I am sometimes frustrated by the amount of digging required to get to that one fact you really need to know. SI should start thread abstracts! As to the John Huang development, I honestly cannot debate with you on this issue or even discuss because I have done no reading on this bit of news and in fact, just learned of it in the post which mentioned it. I hope you'll accept my apology. And if you do, I hope you will give me a hint as to why you picked the name of tunica albuginea.