To: DDuncan who wrote (35332 ) 1/10/1998 3:07:00 PM From: s martin Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
I think you and Joe both made some very valid points, nice to see there is a voice of reason amongst the group. The people who sold their postions gave their reasoning as being the inability to get answers from the company or their impression that they were being lied to which can hardly be blamed on MK. The company's answer to Big Daddy's question illustrates their arrogant attitude, IMO. To: +Pugs (35328 ) From: +FTJoe Saturday, Jan 10 1998 1:22PM EST Reply # of 35367 >>>If, on the other hand, you are doing this simply because you don't believe a broker should be engaged in this type of activity, then I'm not sure what type of case you would have. I would only caution that if we all did this because someone didn't like what someone else was saying(yes I know it goes a wee bit beyond that) we'd all be spending our time and money defending ourselves. Thanx for listening.<< To: +FTJoe (35330 ) From: +DDuncan Saturday, Jan 10 1998 1:35PM EST Reply # of 35371 I agree I think this is not the direction we need to go. Class action suits are a joke and only go to serve the Lawyers. It will never get to court and will only fill the pockets of the greedy. Mike has only tried to point out the other side. Let the company come clean, they have not come through with all that they have said. Where are the financials, where is the money, where is the water contracts, where is the share totals, where is the clothing contracts, where is the boat, where is the STOCK, it is halted because they have not come clean. I WILL NOT BE ANY PART OF A CLASS ACTION SUIT AGIANST MIKE OR PRINCIBLE AND I THINK YOU SHOULD DIRECT YOU ENERGIES TOWARD THE COMPANY.