SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (78266)12/20/2017 5:27:56 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom  Respond to of 95546
 
Reading further in the Morningstar report, Mr Davuluri postulates the following: Here you have the "bear case" so very eloquently stated.

Risk Abhinav Davuluri, Sr. Eq. Analyst, 19 December 2017

As a subset of the broader semiconductor industry, the memory space is inherently cyclical.

The commoditized DRAM and NAND markets create volatile pricing along with supply and demand imbalances that create challenging periods for firms like Micron.

Another major risk is the strong competition from the likes of Samsung, Hynix, and Toshiba, which may be able to develop technologically superior memory solutions than those of Micron, leading to stretches of underperformance where the latter is unable to adequately invest to bridge product portfolio gaps.

After taking into account these factors, we assign a very high uncertainty rating to Micron.

For fiscal 2018, we believe Micron will enjoy revenue growth of 31%.

Thereafter, we believe Micron’s annual sales growth will slow, with midcycle operating margins in the mid teens.

Given fluctuations in supply and demand cycles, we expect swings in top- and bottom-line performance and accordingly anticipate the firm’s long-term profitability will be limited by the cyclical, commodity-like nature of the memory industry.




To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (78266)12/20/2017 5:31:23 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Return to Sender

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95546
 
A moat would be if one of their memory designs had patents that even the Chinese could not violate then sell knockoffs here in the US. Think of Qualcom for a good example here.

Another moat would be if they make their chips like Intel does in the US and have a year or two lead over their nearest competitor on manufacturing in volume with good yield. You'd have to convince me Samsung doesn't have this lead....