Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (137226)	12/23/2017 9:40:43 AM
From: John Vosilla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217556

Now if you look at the 1%s of any country, they want to prolong their dominance. Well said. Probably need a global collapse prolonged with central bankers out of amunition taking the elites down for the count like in the 1930's? But is that even possible in this day and age? Finally saw the movie 'City of God' set in Rio slums I believe. imdb.com Wonder if there is a Maxine Water's type one percenter anywhere near that hood? Merry Christmas to all

To: elmatador who wrote (137226)	12/23/2017 5:49:19 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217556

... and so the 1% enables what in china ? oh, yes, i remember now ... <<... china continues to copy, learn, study, deliberate, apply, innovate etc etc etc i.e. china copies the manufacturing of tires, becomes the largest manufacturer of tires, innovates in the making of tires, and exports more tires irrespective of trade sanction-this and tariff-barrier-that i am at the moment watching china re-inventing alex g bell's telephone by way of quantum satellite micius, and re-iterating the compass, a china invention, in the form of XPNAV-1 pulsar navigation system - elmat would of course claim pulsar navigation is a copy of the GPS system :0)>> what is wrong w/ the 1%? you are not a communist, are you? you are not suggesting to revolution-ise the 1%, i hope. the words for "revolution" in chinese are "ge ming" the words for "cutting hay" are "ge cao", and "separating" is "ge kai" the words for "fate" is "ming yuen", and so "revolution" means ... well, you figure it out sorry to follow on your non sequitur w/ my own lesser non sequitur 1% also and perhaps not coincidentally enabled admiral zheng he, 36% of global gap, and and and natural scale am unsure of your 1% angle if there was one the 1% is a natural given, just as the 80/20 rule many times applicable, and is always present, no need to mention, a state is, and certainly no need to remind, just as i would not pepper my wonderings w/ "people need to relieve themselves daily for good health", for it also states a given