Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (137519)	12/28/2017 5:25:26 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217561

re <<China Plans to Break Petrodollar Stranglehold Beijing to set up oil-futures trading in the yuan which will be fully convertible into gold on the Shanghai and Hong Kong exchanges>> am unsure that china cares to break anything except to create own gaming protocol ... am on it - to engage w/ the game ... had a few hours ago Message 31408462 added to 0388.hk HK Exchange , that which o wns LME, etc etc, and is at forefront of HK-hubbed front of the RMB rebellion mondovisione.com . The rebellion should be interesting. In the mean time 0388.hk is trending from the lower left to the upper right, imo the correct path. should the saudis get their house in order and after rendering is completed at the ritz carlton hotel, and should the regime be looking out for itself and an independent foreign policy, then maybe, perhaps, possibly saudi aramco would choose to primary / secondary-list in hong kong, on 0388.hk. if and when so, we would have another dot (olive) connected. should saudi aramco choose instead to primary / secondary-list in singapore, then we would connect a different dot. after all, this is an investment thread, even as it be home to cafe to spend time dialoguing whilst waiting for developments. the thing about investment is that it is all about overarching macro (perhaps that which you call salad?) together w/ olives (micro?) we should as far as possible follow through our opinions / observations / surmises / theories / etc w/ actionable to-do's, such that what we believe is used as context for what we do, win or lose, no tears, and done so by logical full expression of belief <=> wager. am sure you would agree that mouthing-off is cheap, mouthing-off simply to disrupt adult dialogue is unbecoming, and mouthing-off to stalk is just psycho. whatever you may think of that i do appearing to be suppression perhaps is just my alt-non-confrontational approach to thread MC-ing, such that the thread as much as possible refrains from having bans, allowing all to express whatever they wish, but having to deal w/ the consequences of whatever any individual chooses to express, doing so without suffering a black ball ban. freedom from ban is at the cost of being called to account. after all, you did anoint me as the chief decider for this relevant-enough thread, did you not? and you do remember why you did so, yes?

To: elmatador who wrote (137519)	12/28/2017 6:17:27 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217561

btw, besides the lucky thing on add to 0388.hk in line with my read of the overarching macro, looks like the same overarching read is favourably levitating my gold-add this Message 31408462 is how we make our read of overarching macro relevant - doing full expression by way of doing, per olives in salad or whatever, even as we do public good to defend thread peace allowing thread prosperity, etc etc, and only in the eyes of some beholder as showboating and suppression i thought people of substance would naturally engage in constructive dialogue and not have any inclination to descend into randomness, strutting, stalking, and such. i believe i am correct.