SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (32764)1/10/1998 6:13:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9  Respond to of 58727
 
I need to clarify something

My head is so far up another body part...that I cant even get my names right.

I just realized that I used John Lukers name when I was really meaning someone else!!

Sorry John( i dont even know if you are trading anymore or even around)

This is how bad my life is right now....

Oh man....

Sorry John (not to detract from you at all, though)and the person that I really meant(Paul)!!!

What a huge F&*K up.



To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (32764)1/11/1998 5:13:00 AM
From: MonsieurGonzo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
Lisa; RE:" The Man With No Name..."

on the astrology thing...it was sometime this week..cant remember
who posted it...but it would have had to been jan 8 or 9 as the date
was jan 8 on the forecast...it was something that came from yahoo


...this is about the fourth or fifth time that you have "not recollected my name" when I have posted something either to the thread or, directly to you. My name is Steve. I've been here for some years. Considering the quality of the shit I smoke in Amsterdam, yours must be even better, grrrl ;-)

Playing with METASTOCK package that Santa laid on me - put up some charts on the WWWeb...

geocities.com

...they are 1024h x 635v .jpg

The trends and support levels are hand-made, as always; The dashed lines are magic fibonacci numbers that Judy got me curious about a coupla months ago. The fibonacci sequence...

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 54, 88, 142...

...is surprising how well this works - especially when we convert the chart to a simple "line" chart (of closing prices) to eliminate all the "noise" and volatility, before laying the fib. reracements over the chart. I can't figure out if there is a there, there - or if I am unconciously "fitting the data", not unlike a ouija-board effect. At any rate - the fibonacci levels and 200 EMA are like, right here, right now on the major market indices.

-Steve <------ the man with no name (^_^)