Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (137562)	12/29/2017 3:38:28 AM
From: elmatador	1 Recommendation Recommended By Cogito Ergo Sum Respond to of 219836

Zero Hedge is a dodgy site. If one knows how process information, one can see angles he editors are trying to give. I read them more frequently just post financial crisis of 2008. Up to 2010 they used to focus on China debt and I kept an eye on them. After 2010 they no longer covered China debt. About 2010 to 2012 i saw that China growth must go down as the law of big numbers caughtup with them/ That means 100 dollars would produce a bigger unit of GDP on the early 80s than in 2012. (THE ANT can perhaps chip in about that economics factor.) To produce the same GDP unit they would need $10.000 in 2012. As the Chinese know only the Stalinist economy, the one that you take that $100 and invest labor, steel and oil, they never made the leap to the post-Stalinist economy. That is the OBOR company is here in Kenya building stuff. To m,y surprise, China kept throwing money at the economy as it was early 80s.