SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137648)12/30/2017 4:20:55 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Maurice Winn

  Respond to of 218137
 
re <<Looks suspiciously like Iraq's WMD fake news issued by the disbanded (giggle) Office of Disinformation.

... Such lies are often the prelude to attackers doing what they want to do and just want an excuse. Any excuse is usually good enough and near enough for government work.
>>

... looks like 'they' want to attack freedom island hong kong

... taiwan company leased a hong kong registered boat to ship s.korean refined oil that transferred cargo to an alleged n.korean ship and three 'other' ships, conveniently capture by usa satellite; the original ship returned to s.korean port. standard hollywood script.

suspicions: false flag set up by taiwan, s.korea, or usa. no mention of any evidence that any oil reached n.korea.

let us see what if anything taiwan next says ... scmp.com = taiwan so far says the company that chartered the ship is not registered in taiwan but in marshall islands (formerly admin-ed by team usa and only gained 'independence' in 1979)

nothing to see ... move along ... and pay no attention to the black helicopters

let us see what if anything the marshall islands authorities have to say, whilst holding their nose

bbc.com

North Korea: South seizes ship amid row over illegal oil transfer



AFP
The Lighthouse Winmore filled up with oil to take to Taiwan but never went there, it is alleged

South Korea has revealed it seized a Hong Kong-registered ship last month suspected of supplying oil to the North in breach of international sanctions.

Officials said the Lighthouse Winmore had secretly transferred 600 tonnes of refined oil to a North Korean ship.

A UN Security Council resolution bans ship-to-ship transfers of any goods destined for Pyongyang.

The revelations came as China denied claims by President Donald Trump it had allowed oil shipments to the North Korea

What happened with the Lighthouse Winmore? The ship entered Yeosu port in South Korea on 11 October to load up with refined oil and left for Taiwan four days later, Yonhap news agency reported.

But instead of going to Taiwan it transferred the oil to a North Korean ship and three other vessels in international waters on 19 October, South Korean officials were quoted as saying.

This defies a UN Security Council resolution imposed on 11 September.

The New York Times said the transfer was captured in US satellite photos, released by the US Treasury in November, although the Lighthouse Winmore was not named by the Treasury.

The Lighthouse Winmore was seized when it returned to Yeosu in November and remains in South Korea, South Korean officials said.

Was China involved?There is no evidence for this, as although the Lighthouse Winmore is Hong Kong-flagged, it was leased by a Taiwanese company, Billions Bunker Group Corp.

Taiwan's Presidential Office said the company that chartered the ship was not incorporated in Taiwan, but did not say whether the firm's owner or officials are Taiwanese.

The Chinese government said the accusations against it were "not consistent with the facts".

"China has never allowed Chinese enterprises nor individuals to violate UN Security Council resolutions imposed on the DPRK," foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said.

China handles about 90% of the North's foreign trade.

Why was Trump riled?There has been increasing suspicion in Washington that Chinese ships have been secretly transferring petroleum to North Korean vessels at sea.

China has continued to deny this, saying it fully enforces UN resolutions against Pyongyang.

On Thursday, Mr Trump tweeted he was "very disappointed" with China, which he said had been "caught red-handed".

The tweet followed a report on the issue in South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo.

Quoting South Korean government officials, the report said the illegal ship-to-ship transfers had been filmed by US spy satellites about 30 times since October.

President Trump told the New York Times he had "been soft" on trade issues with China because he wanted its help on North Korea but was now threatening to end that.

He said: "Oil is going into North Korea. That wasn't my deal. If they don't help us with North Korea, then I do what I've always said I want to do."

Is oil part of the sanctions against the North?Yes. Last week Beijing supported a US-drafted UN resolution that included measures to slash the North's petrol imports by up to 90%.

The 22 December sanctions also refer specifically to attempts by the North to procure prohibited goods.

The measures address the "illicit imports of petroleum through deceptive maritime practices by requiring Member States to seize, inspect and freeze any vessel in their ports and territorial waters for involvement in prohibited activities".



On Thursday, the UN Security Council also denied international port access to four more North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned goods, AFP reported. It would bring the total number of ships blocked by the UN to eight.

North Korea is already subject to a raft of sanctions from the US, the UN and the EU.

The latest round was sparked by the 29 November launch of a ballistic missile, which flew higher than any other the North has tested.

In a typically bellicose response, North Korea described the new sanctions as an "act of war".

Mr Trump has previously threatened to "totally destroy" North Korea if it launches a nuclear attack. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has described the US president as "mentally deranged".



North Korea said in November its latest missile was capable of reaching Washington DCHave previous sanctions worked?They have been imposed for more than a decade with little success.

In fact, North Korea has said fresh sanctions will only make it accelerate its nuclear programme. It has continued to test nuclear and ballistic missiles despite these recent examples of UN pressure:

30 November 2016: UN targeted North Korea's valuable coal trade with China, slashing exports by about 60% under a new sales cap. Exports of copper, nickel, silver, zinc and the sale of statues were also bannedWhat happened next? On 14 May 2017, North Korea tested what it said was a "newly developed ballistic rocket" capable of carrying a large nuclear warhead2 June 2017: UN imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on four entities and 14 officials, including the head of North Korea's overseas spying operationsWhat happened next? On 4 July, North Korea claimed it had carried out its first successful test of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)6 August 2017: UN banned North Korean exports of coal, ore and other raw materials and limited investments in the country, costing Pyongyang an estimated $1bn - about a third of its export economyWhat happened next? On 3 September, North Korea said it had tested a hydrogen bomb that could be miniaturised and loaded on a long-range missile



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137648)12/30/2017 9:45:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218137
 
it must be a simple matter to discover the shareholders and directors of the companies involved, as the KYC papering in HK is very strict, and in Marshall Islands strict enough.

so, if i understand correctly, after a months the authorities still cannot release the details would not be because they do not have the details, but because they find the details inconvenient.

anyone can register any company in HK as long as the papering proper - however opening bank account for the company may be involved (near impossible, unless locally registered company w/ true copy of details of whatever daisy chain of parent companies.

watch & brief

https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/south-korea-oil-tankers-seizure-seoul-shows-its-displeasure-china

South Korea: With Oil Tanker's Seizure, Seoul Shows Its Displeasure With ChinaRelations between Seoul and Beijing continue to erode. South Korea revealed Dec. 29 that last month it had seized a Hong Kong-flagged tanker involved in an at-sea transfer of refined petroleum products to a North Korean vessel, a violation of sanctions against North Korea under U.N. Security Council Resolution 2375. The announcement comes as the United Nations is considering a list of 10 ships to sanction for illicit trade with North Korea, and follows the U.S. Treasury Department's release of images of Chinese vessels transferring petroleum products to North Korean ships at sea in violation of U.N. sanctions. The incident will strengthen U.S. criticism of China's support for North Korea.

The Lighthouse Winmore, an oil tanker owned by Hong Kong-based Lighthouse Ship Management Ltd. and chartered by the Marshall Islands-incorporated Taiwanese company Billions Bunker Group Corp., visited the South Korean port of Yeosu on Oct. 11 to take on a load of refined petroleum from Japan that allegedly was bound for Taiwan. According to South Korean officials, the ship instead sailed into the East China Sea, where around Oct. 19 it transferred some 600 tons of the refined petroleum to the North Korean ship Sam Jong 2; it also transferred petroleum to three other ships not from North Korea. South Korean authorities, informed by U.S. intelligence, seized the Lighthouse Winmore when it returned to Yeosu on Nov. 24. Information is sparse on the two private companies involved, but it may not be coincidental that the original name of Lighthouse Ship Management Ltd. was Billion Great International Group Ltd.

While the incident is not proof that China is behind the violations of sanctions, Beijing opposes listing the Lighthouse Winmore, several other Chinese-affiliated ships and the Sam Jong 2 as sanctions violators by the United Nations. There has long been suspicion that China, or at least Chinese companies (as well as Russia), was violating oil sanctions, and recent reports suggested that gasoline prices were actually falling in Pyongyang. U.S. President Donald Trump, in apparent reference to images and information from the U.S. Treasury Department, tweeted Dec. 28, "Caught RED HANDED — very disappointed that China is allowing oil to go into North Korea." With South Korea's seizure, and the information it has gleaned from the ship's manifest, log book and GPS tracks, there will be further evidence of sanctions violations and increased political pressure toward China. This may also spur discussion of additional secondary sanctions against Chinese companies and banks.

For South Korea, it is noteworthy that, although the ship was impounded in late November, the information wasn't revealed until more than a month later. This may have been a diplomatic gesture, as South Korean President Moon Jae In visited China Dec. 13-16 in an attempt to ease tensions between the two countries and spur economic and tourist exchanges. But Moon's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping did not go well, and shortly after his visit, on Dec. 18, the South Korean military scrambled aircraft to intercept a Chinese flight comprising two H-6 bombers and a Tu-154 reconnaissance plane escorted by two J-11 fighters that flew over the disputed Ieodo-Suyan Rock. While such flights are not uncommon, the timing was a clear signal of China's continued displeasure with the deployment of the U.S. Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system in South Korea and Seoul's refusal to commit to further demands from China on regional security issues. Announcing the seizure of the Lighthouse Winmore now will reinforce the likelihood the ship will be included on the list of sanctions violators, a subtle way for South Korea to show its displeasure with China. But it may also mean that the economic tensions between the two will continue, and China may not lift official or unofficial restrictions on tourists to South Korea, something Seoul was counting on to bolster its February hosting of the Winter Olympics.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137648)12/31/2017 9:35:04 AM
From: TobagoJack3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Arran Yuan
dvdw©
pak73

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218137
 
rapidly approaching 2018

made resolution to be kinder and gentler and and and

i hope all the thread participants, one and all shall do same and be self-monitoring

health and prosperity to you and yours, and to all here

cheers, jay