Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1045824)	12/31/2017 1:05:22 PM
From: locogringo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576328

You continue to live in LALALAND. It will be so much fun watching you implode in 2018 then drop off the face of the planet like Comrade zax did after the re-election of Donald J Trump in a landslide victory in 2020. My guess would be that such an election would turn you into a blithering drooling brainless liberal, but you are already there. HTH and enjoy your Play-Doh and puppy therapy. You are not destined for reality, nor could you handle it.

To: Land Shark who wrote (1045824)	12/31/2017 2:12:04 PM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Honey_Bee longnshort majaman1978 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576328

How about a dose of reality? Gregg Jarrett @GreggJarrett 3h3 hours ago NYT: the FBI launched an investigation of Trump because one of his volunteer staffers heard a rumor that Russia had obtained hacked emails that would damage Clinton. Where is the suspected crime involving Trump or his campaign that would merit the FBI investigating them? Gregg Jarrett @GreggJarrett 2h2 hours ago It is not a crime to talk to a guy in London who talked to a guy in Russia who conveyed a rumor which is later passed on to an Australian diplomat who gives it to the FBI. Yet, the FBI started a case against Trump based on quadruple hearsay involving no criminal acts? Gregg Jarrett@GreggJarrett 2h2 hours ago The NYT reporters were used . A splashy front page story that purports to justify the FBI probe of Trump, yet the published account offers no legal justification. Why didn’t they write a story of how the FBI launched an improper, if not illegal, criminal investigation of Trump? HT:Ms Bee