Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35480)	1/10/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

mike, i agree with you 100%, life is one big gamble, an america is a free country. go you best shot. win or lose in life, let it be your choice. RMIL is the right choice, we will see next week. joey

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35480)	1/11/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Michael, I'll slow down on my "incessant banter" the moment that the Yeahs begin publically acknowledging that RMIL has some explaining to do to its shareholders. I also would like to see people cease Hyping this stock based on intangibles that are contrary to what has been reported here and the recent 8K. We are beginning to see this occur wiht some of the Longs in RMIL. I have no problem with shareholders having high hopes and visions for an eventual success for RMIL. To contest this would be the height of hippocracy since we all have these aspirations for almost every stock we have bought. My gripe has consistently been with people willing to blatantly disregard the realities of this company and saying that filings and fundamentals don't matter, while hyping a series of failed or delayed promises and short squeeze scenarios. I have never been involved in a discussion thread where pertinent and verifiable information has been so maliciously derided just because it doesn't fit the "fantasy" of RileyG and Pugs (as well as a few others) It has been a travesty to the practice of due diligence to call someone a liar just because they have revealed that your company's management has misrepresented itself to the general public in is filings. I submit that this misrepresentation has been willful on the part of the company, and exacerbated by those out here who believe speaking with company insiders is equivalent to proper due diligence. It sets a poor example and frustrates the rest of us who wish to preserve the integrity of the internet as a tool for gathering and sharing sound information. Regards, Ron