Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137836)	1/5/2018 3:25:43 PM
From: GPS Info	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218556

A perfectly outlined racist theory.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137836)	1/5/2018 10:08:48 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218556

We took the science and technology from the Arabs. Algebra. Algorism. Alcohol.Algorithm. Alchemy Alcatrao (Tar) Almiscar (Musk) a class odf aromatic substances used as base notes in perfumery Most words that start with Al are of Arab origins because they were the guys who worked that out The Hindu–Arabic numeral system (also called the Arabic numeral system) yes, that too. Again, your ideas based on limited world views and ignorance. Sad. Perhaps TJ thinks as well the Chinese invented everything. Actually the last thing China invented was the compass.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (137836)	1/8/2018 1:21:09 PM
From: Horgad	1 Recommendation Recommended By GPS Info Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218556

"Making things is evolutionary success. Relativity theory and CDMA are steps to evolutionary victory. One bright bloke with a can of fly spray and machine gun beats a pack of wolves or lions and makes short work of an annoying ant nest. One man with an atomic bomb and aircraft dealt with Hiroshima." You don't have to be bright to use a can of fly spray, a machine gun, or drop a bomb. If some bright people invent something, that enables a bunch of stupid/average people to have a bunch more stupid/average kids while the bright people are deciding to have less kids, evolution will move towards favoriting stupid/average. "Women choose intelligent men not just because they want a nice handbag and car." And women choose stupid/average men more often and have more babies with those stupid/average men...so not sure what your point is. "If you believe your own theory then black skinned people are inferior. Count the light skinned men of 30,000 years ago and today. The ratio of light to black has gone from almost none to about 6 to 1 = depending on what you call black. Silly Obama claimed to be black though he was half white." Firstly, it is not my theory...it is just the basic math on what happens when one group or species manages to have more babies and their babies manage to have more babies, etc. It may be that pure African is losing the "race", but by that logic pure Caucasian's are also losing. Or it may be more accurate to say that all races are winners to slightly, varying degrees as the "races" merge. "But your theory is bung." Again, not my theory. I'm still waiting to here a better one. "It's a long and complex process. Winning now doesn't mean winning in the long run. But brainpower has been winning for millions of years and that's the long run." The average brainpower of the human species has clearly helped the species dominate other species, helped them increase their population, and helped them spread across the globe. But it is very possible that there is NO significant evolution going on today that favors individuals with greater brainpower or education or success or wealth over those with less. Ask yourself, how does being average today limit how many babies you can successfully raise? "While an ant, worm and bacteria are equally winning like you and me right now, they can never do anything but bug type stuff. We can invent anything we can imagine that complies with the laws of physics." Nature doesn't give a crap about our toys or about our level knowledge. As you said, other species are equally winning or are even much more successful than humans by natural standards. "We can even go bionic. We including people with the good brains..not just me and you. Ignorant simplistic evolutionists who just count descendants think that homosexuals are unsuccessful. But evolution includes all sorts of methods. Without a ball and chain a homosexual man like Alan Turing is free to go full scale deflection. He can get victory for millions of his relatives do his genes carry on." I get the impression that you are micing "success" by human standards with "success" in nature. Obviously a genetic line, race, or species that can't or won't reproduce will die out. "Americans have got hordes of Ashkenazi Jews who invent great stuff so the unintelligent blacks whites women and wankers can think they are exceptional as they waddle into Wal-Mart. But those less intelligent people can make up a pretty good army and defend Israel against genocidal stupid Arabs. If the Arabs weren't so stupid they would be thrilled that intelligent productive people set up shop in their neighborhood. Arabs have got the evolutionary numbers in the area for now, but wait." No Comment