Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s martin who wrote (35581)	1/11/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

The company's response to Daddy's questions: Subject: Re: My Company-many question's Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:53:07 EST From: Ovisusa <Ovisusa@aol.com> Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) To: guff@Penn.Com 90% of your answers are in the 10Ks, 10Qs and 8Ks which all have been filed. You will find in all cases that we have reported to the public as required and that is why the SEC released the Halt What confuses me was the SEC explanation of a 10 day trading halt is just that, a ten day halt of the trading of RMIL securities, and after it runs through that statutory period, it expires automatically. The official response from RMIL is that SEC RELEASED the halt, as if they took an action. The company has been in direct contact with the SEC; we have gone through the requirements regarding initiation of trading which lies primarily in the hands of market makers and NASD, and yet the official response from the company is, "You will find in all cases that we have reported to the public as required and that is why the SEC released the Halt" Hopefully the SEC will be willing to confirm this definitive statement tomorrow and RMIL will provide the public current financial filings. My question is, did the company report to the public as required and therefore that is why the SEC released the halt as the company has advised an owner, or was it simply a statutory expiration of a 10 day trading halt?