Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (52475)	1/16/2018 5:00:14 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 364363

>> Well, it would be common sense to a normal person that a poor person without health insurance will not be as healthy as a person with health insurance. But I proved to you with the previous post there is, at the very least, a legitimate debate to be had about it. The question of whether people got healthier due to the Medicaid expansion is what we were talking about. Now that you have been proved wrong, you want to change the disagreement. That is not what a "social scientist" does. You stand behind your claims with science, or you say, "I was wrong." Or perhaps, the "jury is out and here's why." You have done none of the above. And frankly, this is one example of dozens where you have done the same thing on various topics with different posts. It leads one to the conclusion that you claim to be a "social scientist" but either do not understand the "science" part (my belief) or are simply too lazy and uninformed to make your case. Either way, it is pathetic. Your posts amount to trolling. There are others here who are the same, but they aren't constantly going on about education, the importance of learning, and the value of education in arriving at the truth. IMO, you are full of shit as a christmas goose.