Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (138234)	1/17/2018 11:17:44 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217764

Oh the Global Village Canadian! The medium influences the message. But I created a way around that. If you are like me, assumption-based, you make an assumption. Then you try to find facts to validate that assumption. The more facts you find that validate that assumption, the more power that assumption has. At the same time, not to be biased, you keep tbs on facts that demolish your assumption. The more facts show your assumption is wrong, the less power your assumption has. If one, like me does that, the medium does not matter. You are picking facts from whatever source. The re-population. Mass migration or tax payer importation was one of my assumptions. Have that in mind since late 80s, a time it was costly to get information record and cross check. Bought first Macintosh in 1989 to help me. By the time I put to other to scrutinize it, MQ came to destroy something that I had a decade in the making. Till this day, my assumption is being proved right and stronger by the day. Return to natural size, taken from Paul Kennedy book. it was directed to the US. I redirected to Japan creating the assumption: Return to the insignificance it came from. When frst time Tj read that he came out saying. Japn was the banker of the world etc etc TJ has a colonized mind. Do does MQ. A colonized mind is the guy who thinks someone somewhere is strong and powerful and who are you to come disputing that. You give the evidence but the guy prefer to hear a cricket inside his head. Basically saying; When I write about an assumption I made, it is 2o years old in the making. Not the result of watching an Yotube.