To: michael d kugler who wrote (35830 ) 1/11/1998 11:19:00 PM From: Michael P. Weber Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
Michael, Your wrong again! I did prove that you lied, go back and read! Oh yea, I forgot you have a reading comprehension problem!!! I'll repost it for you again! It really is too bad that your not MAN enough to admit you made a mistake and chose to call me a liar. The fact is you were wrong and you spread lies yourself! Apparently you can't read. For the benefit of the people that read this board, this is what was stated in the 8K for RMIL: <<<An 8K dated 10/7/97 was filed reference the merger of Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc., and Olympus Ventures, Inc. In this agreement Rocky Mountain was to transfer 4,000,000 shares of MVP Holdings, with a guaranteed value of $14,000,000 at the end of the twelfth month of the merger. In this agreement the Company held back 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as protection against the asset not being available at the end of the required time. An amendment to the agreement has removed the 4,000,000 shares and the Company will not issue the 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.>>> Nowhere here does it state that they have abandoned their quest as you call it for the 4mil MVPH. It does appear as though it is no longer a requirement of the merger to transfer the 4mil MVPH shares by the end of the 12 month period. Note: This does not say anywhere that they will not legally pursue the 4 mil shares along with the augmentation agreement that are rightfully RMCW's per a contractual agreement.Per PRTI's Attorney on 1/5/98 - PRTI assigned the 4 mil shares of MVPH to RMCW because they claimed in essence 15Mil in damages. To: Michael P. Weber (344 ) From: michael d kugler Tuesday, Jan 6 1998 6:50PM EST Reply # of 351 Michael, I spoke with Milton Price, PRTI's attorney today. He informed me that due to the exercise of MVPH's first right of refusal, the 4 million shares were distributed to real PRTI shareholders. And he further added that, in his professional legal opinion, the neither Puhr, RMCW, or RMIL have any legal claim to those shares. Why do you continue to deliberately mislead posters here? Perhaps you should immediately apologize for your actions. So you got this from the same source as I did. Big deal. Do you really expect him to have a biased opinion? I'm sure he told you more than your posting here. Why have you omitted information? Mainly because it doesn't help your cause!!! We are at a stalemate here unless you grow up and be a MAN! Your wrong and you owe me an apology! Mike