Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (360928)	1/22/2018 3:52:08 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541582

Yeah, ain't that a bitch... non-toxic long-life chemicals that you could have in your home or appartment. I saw some BS article that some here posted a few days ago saying that distributed power was more vulnerable to cycber attack. I was busy or I would have shouted "bullsh!t!". Of course it isn't - if you individually (or as a small collective) can pull away from the grid because you have a non-toxic flow cell powering your subdivision, the power system becomes, in essence, immune from the grid disruptions. At nodes - the smart reconnect would allow a toe-in-the-water design that allows individuals to assess their cost-benefit ratio of grid (re)connection.