SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zzpat who wrote (1050629)1/25/2018 5:48:25 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586669
 
Evidence mounts of Obama involvement in Dinesh D'Souza's selective prosecution
By Monica Showalter
Would President Obama have been that petty to target a critic for draconian law enforcement over a movie? The way the Soviet KGB might have targeted a dissident?

Well, given the common thread of socialism in both, it shouldn't be a big surprise that he would.

It now comes to light that apparently, yes, he did. Dinesh D'Souza reports that he seems to have been in that unlucky category, targeted for any violation however minor, after making a couple of richly textured, artistically good and very popular critical movies about Obama. When a minor campaign finance violation was finally found after all that looking, D'Souza got the book thrown at him.

He now tweets that there is evidence for it:




Dinesh D'Souza

?@DineshDSouza


My file—obtained by the House Oversight Committee—shows FBI red-flagged me as an Obama critic & allocated $100 K to investigate a $20 K case

9:35 PM - Jan 23, 2018


1,7131,713 Replies


15,13415,134 Retweets


27,49427,494 likes


Twitter Ads info and privacy



and that quite a few government resources went into ensuring he got arrested for something, anything. Here's what he thinks might have been done, given the taxpayer cash that went into pinning something, anything, on him :






Dinesh D'Souza

?@DineshDSouza


If Obama ordered surveillance on @realDonaldTrump in 2016, I wonder if he ordered it on me in 2012, leading to my selective prosecution

7:33 PM - Jan 23, 2018


2,2222,222 Replies


9,8519,851 Retweets


27,86827,868 likes


Twitter Ads info and privacy

It's creepy to think there are lawmen with that little integrity out there to have not spoken out about such a blatant abuse of police power for political purposes. And it suggests that law enforcement agencies are shot through with leftists, which would mean no diversity of thought in the ranks, same as welfare, public defender, and other leftwing agencies.

What this vast expansion of resources - $100,000 for a $20,000 at most violation - also shows that Obama's claims to "prioritization of resources" such as he claimed when he enabled the open border and its "child migrants" - was spoken with a forked tongue.

There was prioritization all right and it had nothing to do with best use of resources. It had everything to do with what was politically best for himself.

And lastly, it validates the truth about D'Souza's claims made in his movies that Obma had a fascistic streak. He was not only like Benito Mussolini, he acted like Mussolini, given his "priorities."

If D'Souza is correct about the documents showing this kind of selective prosecution, it's no different from the IRS's targeting of political dissidents. Heads should roll for this, and miscreants should be brought to justice - as far up as justice will go.



To: zzpat who wrote (1050629)1/25/2018 6:33:04 PM
From: Sdgla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586669
 
I gave you a link to corps responding to the Trump GOP tax plan, actual legislation, with $$$$’s being passed back to American taxpayers and you are unable to respond to that fact with anything other than another typical zzliar lie.

Why is that ?



To: zzpat who wrote (1050629)1/25/2018 8:09:20 PM
From: longnshort4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
D.Austin
dave rose
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586669
 

At what point do we call it blatantly obvious?



To: zzpat who wrote (1050629)1/25/2018 8:13:12 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1586669
 
a free press my ass "Journalist" helped suppress 2005 photo of Obama with Farrakhan for fear it would hurt his political career Hot Air 8 hotair