Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (138666)	1/27/2018 4:50:43 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219580

In Brazil we call this: Having an orgasm with other guy's erection. Let me explain the scientific prowess. You suffer because you do not read what I call the Big Read. Only talking with people over a dinner is chit chat. Luckliy You have Elmat to translate the world to you and to the thread. The blogger mentioned in your article is making little thinking. Elma does big thinking. But not from today, for 3 decades before. Actually the book is called Com by K. short of Competition by Knowledge Here is the chapter about Big Science

To: TobagoJack who wrote (138666)	1/29/2018 10:23:16 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219580

This outtake is false: "NSB chair Maria Zuber told Nature, “The U.S. continues to be the global leader in science and technology, but the world is changing. We can't be asleep at the wheel." During a public briefing on the NSB’s report, head of the NSF France Córdova warned, “We are involved in a global race for knowledge. We may be the innovation leader today, but other countries are rapidly gaining ground.” which leads to innovation. Spurious correlations must be weeded out from narratives such as the one portrayed in the article. Its False that countries are/should be measured on some scale by quantity of publishing iterated r&d. Compartmentalization leads only to some momentum or another. Take a look at a picture of those attending the Solvay Conference for Physics in 1927. Each participant had a nationality by birth, singularly that affectation did them no good, it is only in the presence of other individuals who share an interest in a subject, do breakthroughs emerge. Combanatorial intelligence happens within narrow interest groups be it physics or chemistry or any other science. Look closely at the attendees. en.wikipedia.org In order for breakthroughs to occur, participants must become extra national.... You can see, none of the participants nationalities, ended up translating too any nation/ National leadership of the entire field. Spurious correlations are at this time just as dangerous as compartmentalization. Learn to know the difference between r&d innovation by iteration from compartmentalized participation; and true breakthroughs in understanding about this world we live in.. By direct observation, its fairly clear that goal seeking systems are desirous too accord to themselves, credit where none is actually due. Incarnated souls bring missions onto the planet, no amount of nationalization contributes to these souls from making the connections with other souls with similar missions. Until we realize HAPUC, we have nothing but more of the same spurious correlations augmenting national ego.