Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2118)	1/12/1998 1:04:00 AM
From: tech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3391

Not exactly. The British may use inmates due to the lack of resources. CSGI's toolset (with the Automated Factory Approach) dramatically lessons the need for "bodies" and manual conversions. Ergo, the CSGI / CHASE partnership should be very successful getting business in Europe. No inmates needed furthermore, the lack of resources, in general, shows that companies will not be able to hire, or even keep, sufficient staff to do conversion projects in-house. These projects will flow to the service providers, and the same demand and supply forces will cause the providers to use the conversion houses. Chase has already realized this, as have all of CSGI's partners, and they have wrapped their services around the ConSyGen toolset and embraced the "Automated Factory Approach". I feel that we will see more and more Y2k service providers realize that they don't have the needed resources and must use the conversion houses. In my opinion, the code will eventually find its way to the conversion houses, regardless whether the clients themselves turn it over, or the services providers the clients hire turn it over.