Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Voteau who wrote (2120)	1/13/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: Trader X	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3391

What I find both interesting and damning for CSGI. While it's true that many, if not most companies, have failed to begin the major fixes they require, it's also true that a significant number have begun the process. From that number that have begun, we have how many contracts for what is touted as the best solution by CSGI? Meanwhile, every...I mean every other viable Y2K company has been getting Contracts with a capital "C". Something doesn't wash in this picture. If the CSGI "automated" solution is the next best thing since sliced bread, then where are the contracts? Certain promoters of CSGI blame the lack of contracts on the vast number of companies that haven't started their fixes yet. Meanwhile, every other Y2K conversion company gets contracts... hard, green, cash. Not tests. Not trials. I think this is evidence of something amiss, and partially explains why the stock is down over 50% from the IPO. -Mean Deviation

To: Rick Voteau who wrote (2120)	1/13/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: tech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

Conclusion ....... >> While it's true that many, if not most companies, have failed to begin the major fixes they require, it's also true that a significant number have begun the process. << - Kevin Hansen SORRY, NOT TRUE. The evidence clearly shows that the floodgates have yet to open and a significant number of companies have NOT even begun to address the y2k. Anyone who claims the opposite is completely ignorant to what is happening in the marketplace.