SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1053816)2/8/2018 11:51:20 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578295
 
No. This is Unacceptable.


Erick Erickson

Conservatives in Congress must absolutely vote no on this.

Republicans in Congress are proposing a long term continuing resolution and increase of the debt ceiling. They want to get rid of any and all spending restraint and increase the national debt to well over $20 trillion without any offsets. This is completely unacceptable.

Republicans in Congress should oppose this fiscal recklessness. They are further indebting us to China and risking our national security via our fiscal solvency. They are mortgaging our children's future.

Democrat plans to jack up taxes are unacceptable because they would wreck havoc on the economy and even a 100% tax rate would not generate enough revenue to deal with the problem. Congress must make cuts. Those cuts need to be real cuts, not future prospective cuts that never come.

Conservatives in Congress need to stand up and be heard on this issue. They must vote no and reject this recklessness.

themaven.net

This is Highly Irresponsible
Erik Erickson

Congress will, yet again, raise spending with no real cuts.

The party of less government is jacking up spending with the Democrats. This is highly, highly disappointing and it is hard to see how the Democrats in charge would behave differently.

The latest budget deal will jack up spending by over $300 billion. They will also raise the debt ceiling again.

The agreement increases defense spending this year by $80 billion and domestic spending by $63 billion beyond strict budget caps, according to a summary of the deal obtained by POLITICO. Next year defense spending will increase by $85 billion and domestic funding will be boosted by $68 billion beyond the caps. The deal also includes $140 billion for defense and $20 billion for domestic in emergency spending over two years.

A plan to lift the debt limit, which requires action in the coming weeks, and whether to extend expiring tax provisions were among the few outstanding issues that could be attached to the deal, according to aides in both parties familiar with the talks.

We are exceeding $20 trillion in national debt, which is not sustainable. The Democrat solution of tax increases would not solve the problem as that would slow down the economy and drive dollars out of the United States. Congress needs to cut spending and cut spending dramatically. They are not doing it. There is no incentive for Congress to be responsible with our tax dollars and Congress will bankrupt us as a result.

theresurgent.com



AZ Libertarian

This deal also makes the Republicans look like hypocrites for all of the insistence on austerity and deficit reduction when Obama was in office. Spending without concern for the debt and deficit under Bush, and then returning to the exact same behavior under Trump, supports the argument that Republicans don't really care about fiscal responsibility, and only pretend to do so when out of power to hamper Democratic priorities. It will be much harder to take Republican deficit hawks seriously in the future if they only care about the issue when in the minority.

themaven.net



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1053816)2/8/2018 12:01:26 PM
From: zzpat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578295
 
You have to negatives in a sentence but I think I understand what you wrote.

The ACA set a date certain when all states were required to set up exchanges. The Federal website was created in case a state couldn't set up an exchange because of fraud or technical problems. It was never intended to deal with every republican governor breaking the law.