Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (139121)	2/8/2018 3:48:57 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218860

it is a temporary bang, as in circuit breaker, to re-establish good-behaviour order and protect the cafe from meddlers and trouble-makers, so, please bear w/ me as such is necessary to protect freedom and uphold liberty, unlike those other truly heavy-handed threads where they systemically constrain freedom of speech and actively promote liberty to ignorance by sidestepping mathematical logic, historical common sense, and expression of group reckoning as to fake news, which country produces the most widely spread news? who does rex work for? i had from si administration a note warning that this particular thread would be moved to the political thread should it be deemed to be political, and as i do not exercise control over the platform, and have no wish to have the cafe deemed a political gathering place, so i safeguard what the thread was meant to be and shall remain should you wish to engage primarily in political discussions, you are free to do so, but elsewhere on the si platform should you do so, you can post here as you please, on topic, namely 2026 teotwawki ... 2032 darkest interregnum in accordance w/ Message 31476400 should you label the thread as off-topic due to china news flow, please be aware, china has much to do w/ the topic of the thread, that be disruption to the what is, by what of of many could be trust you see the logic.