Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1054796)	2/15/2018 9:25:32 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574043

The Steele dossier hasn't been debunked at all, not a teeny tiny bit of it. It hasn't been confirmed either. You're starting to catch on.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1054796)	2/16/2018 1:04:21 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 1574043

Why did they find it necessary to hide the provenance of the Steele dossier as they were seeking warrants from FISC? That's called lying by omission. They hid it because, the FISC would not have granted warrants based on a questionable dossier procured by Steele, who was an agent that the FBI themselves called questionable with little credibility, and paid for by the opposition candidate, Hillary and the DNC, in a Presidential Election. The FISC was lied to. That itself is a felony. The warrants that were secured and all evidence that came from them afterwards are fruit of the poisoned vine and not admissible in a court of law, and for good reason. It all reeks of a set up and a conspiracy to overthrow a Democratically elected President.