SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (139568)3/2/2018 12:06:48 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218014
 
I'll be reinforcing my 8K sq ft garden plot :))



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (139568)3/2/2018 8:06:58 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218014
 
Am not concerned about nuclear war. Should it happen then all worries end.

Re the biological sciences / final frontier, seems to me the cost of research is comparatively modest in order to prove out concept relative to ideas requiring big capex spends (space colony etc etc) and efficacious apps more immediate / practical. More bang for any given amount of money.

Figure the game is about absolute number of useful brains to work at spectrum of cerebral levels.

Ring-fencing any innovation would be difficult and speed-to-commercial-market everything.

Watch n brief.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (139568)3/2/2018 8:13:03 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218014
 
The first war is here and now ...

bloomberg.com

Trump Says Trade Wars Are ‘Good, and Easy to Win’
More stories by Joe DeauxMarch 2, 2018, 12:14 AM GMT+8
President Donald Trump pushed back against a wave of criticism against steel tariffs, telling the world that not only are trade wars good, they are easy to win.

Trump is facing anger from manufacturers and trade partners in China and Europe after announcing tariffs of 25 percent on imported steel and 10 percent on aluminum for “a long period of time.” The formal order is expected to be signed next week.

“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win,” Trump said in an early morning tweet on Friday.

When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 6:50 PM - Mar 2, 2018

The aggressive stance has stoked fears of trade retaliation and roiled global markets. The U.S. dollar weakened for a second day against a basket of currencies, while equity markets across the U.S., Asia and Europe have declined.

Trump hasn’t given the details of his proposed action, including whether any products or countries would be exempted.

The planned tariffs, justified on the basis that cut-price metals imports hurt both American producers and national security, now raise the prospect of tit-for-tat curbs on American exports and higher prices for domestic users. While the practical impact may yet turn out to be limited, the political environment for global trade has just taken a turn for the worse.
Trump Roars, China Yawns, U.S. Shoots Itself in Foot: Gadfly

European equities followed Asian markets lower on Friday after losses in the U.S. the day before. Europe’s Stoxx 600 fell 0.7 percent, with many automakers and basic resource companies among major decliners.



Asian stocks had already built on losses seen in the U.S. the previous day, with shares in Hong Kong, Japan, China, Australia and South Korea weaker. Separately, the yen spiked and Japanese assets slumped after Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda discussed the timing of a possible exit from its stimulus policy in parliament.

The official response in China, the world’s largest steel producer, was muted. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying merely said in Beijing Friday that China urges the U.S. to follow trade rules.

Industry insiders were less restrained. The U.S. measures “overturn the international trade order,” Wen Xianjun, vice chairman of the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association, said in a statement. “Other countries, including China, will take relevant retaliatory measures.”

Li Xinchuang, the vice chairman of China Iron and Steel Association, called the move “stupid.”



U.S. allies, seeing their industries threatened, responded with bafflement and dismay. Some also panned the idea that metals imports pose a threat to national security.

“Steel and aluminum imports from Japan, which is an ally, do not affect U.S. national security at all,” Japan’s Trade Minister Hiroshige Seko told reporters in Tokyo Friday. “I would like to convey that to the U.S. when I have an opportunity.”

Read more: How Trump could really hurt China -- by targeting electronics

Canada -- the biggest foreign supplier of steel to the U.S. -- said the measures were unacceptable while the European Union vowed to “ react firmly” with World Trade Organization-compliant countermeasures in the next few days. Australian Trade Minister Steve Ciobo called the move “disappointing” and said his country is seeking an exemption.

The punitive measures would level the unfair playing field that has persisted for years, and make it easier for American companies to expand and hire workers, Trump said.

Read more: How steel became cast as a security issue

U.S. companies from beer brewer MillerCoors to candymaker Hershey Co., which use aluminum for manufacturing and packaging, said operations would be hurt by the tariffs.

“We buy as much domestic can sheet aluminum as is available, however, there simply isn’t enough supply to satisfy the demands of American beverage makers like us,” MillerCoors said in a tweet. “American workers and American consumers will suffer as a result of this misguided tariff.”

Soybean ResponseA U.S. move on tariffs risks provoking retaliation, particularly from Beijing. China has already launched a probe into U.S. imports of sorghum, and is studying whether to restrict shipments of U.S. soybeans -- targets that could hurt Trump’s support in some farming states. While China accounts for just a fraction of U.S. imports of the metals, it’s accused of flooding the global market and dragging down prices.

What Our Economists Say...“China’s total exports of steel and aluminum are equal to about 0.5% of GDP, most of that from steel,” said Bloomberg’s Chief Asia Economist Tom Orlik. “Relative to fears from Trump’s campaign trail rhetoric, in which he threatened an across-the-board 45% tariff on all imports from China, these measures are extremely limited.”

Trump announced the tariffs despite lobbying of his administration by foreign governments, and while Chinese President Xi Jinping’s top economic adviser is in the country on a mission to defuse tensions.

The impact of the step hinges in part on which nations will be affected, said Alex Wolf, senior emerging markets economist at Aberdeen Standard Investments in Hong Kong, who previously worked at the U.S. State Department.

“It’s not much ado about nothing,” he said. "But until we see the final scope of the tariffs and the response from global trading partners it’s hard to say it’s the start of a tit-for-tat trade war."

— With assistance by Justin Sink, Jennifer Jacobs, Daniel Ten Kate, Malcolm Scott, Miao Han, and Jason Scott



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (139568)3/2/2018 8:17:00 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218014
 
I am not reacting to the trade war at the moment

bloomberg.com

Trump Roars; China YawnsSteel tariffs are only going to hurt one country's economy.
More stories by David FicklingMarch 2, 2018, 11:27 AM GMT+8
There's a strange thing about the fire and fury that President Donald Trump is planning to wreak on the foreigners killing American manufacturing: The foreigners don't seem to care.

News of the planned 25 percent tariffs on steel and 10 percent levy on aluminum imports broke during the lunch break on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on Thursday. Shares in Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., China's biggest listed producer, promptly fell the most since, um, Wednesday.

It was the same pattern when markets opened Friday in Asia, with the drops from Japan's biggest producer Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. and Korea's paramount Posco pretty much in line with the declines they suffered two days earlier. 1 That previous slump wasn't prompted by anything going on in Washington, but by an index of Chinese manufacturing that unexpectedly came in about 0.8 points below forecast.

Blink and You'd Miss ItChina's exports of steel to the U.S. represent about 0.2 percent of global trade in the product

Source: International Trade Centre, Gadfly calculations

That's to be expected. For all the sturm und drang coming out of the White House, China's trade in steel and aluminum with the U.S. isn't all that significant. The larger steel side of it represents about 0.2 percent of the global trade, and just 3.3 percent of China's exports to America, on a par with the trade in shoes. Electronics, machinery, furniture, clothing, toys and vehicles -- some of which contain substantial amounts of tariff-exposed metal -- are far more important.

The thing that China's steelmakers care much more about is their domestic market, which consumes about half of the world's steel and has been doing rather well of late. Thanks to a wave of mergers and the shuttering of small-scale electric arc furnaces in recent years, profits from blast furnaces have been enjoying their best run this decade, according to a costs-based index compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence.

Red HotProfits from Chinese blast furnaces are putting in their best performance this decade

Source: Bloomberg Intelligence

It's true there is some connection between China's domestic market and the global one. When Beijing tried to rebalance the economy toward consumption and away from heavy industry in 2013, local demand suffered and exports rose. Still, the overwhelming majority of that product went to South Korea, alongside nations in south and southeast Asia and the Middle East that used Chinese steel to plug gaps in their own production as they increased capacity. The stream of metal that went to the U.S. during those years has already dwindled to a trickle as a result of existing trade actions.

Ripple EffectChina's iron and steel exports have mainly gone to other Asian countries, not the U.S.

Source: International Trade Centre

If, as is commonly asserted in the U.S., China was surreptitiously exploiting back doors through third countries, it's striking that the only two nations among China's top 10 export destinations that are also on America's top 10 import list are South Korea and Taiwan, which are major producers in their own right.

As Gadfly has argued, the Trump administration's focus on metal manufacturing misunderstands the nature of America's trade with the world, where the deficit is not in raw materials, but in finished products.

Old EconomyAmerican steelmakers U.S. Steel, AK Steel, Nucor and Steel Dynamics do far less investment than overseas peers

Source: Bloomberg

It's cheaper for U.S. consumers to buy things made abroad, and that's what they've been doing for many years. Little wonder, then, that U.S. steelmakers have been reluctant to invest, showing some of the lowest rates of capital spending and R&D globally.

That refusal to spend now looks to have got its reward in the form of Washington's new protectionist stance. But the more innovative automative, machinery and aerospace manufacturers that consume American metal are the ones employing more workers and showing better prospects for the country's economy. Lifting the materials costs they face by protecting inefficient local mills is only going to exacerbate their problems.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Baosteel also fell on Friday, so the placid reaction on Thursday may have just been because no one was reading the news -- but even then, the 4.3 percent drop was about in line with the stock's 4.5 percent fall on Tuesday.

To contact the author of this story:
David Fickling in Sydney at dfickling@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Katrina Nicholas at knicholas2@bloomberg.net



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (139568)3/2/2018 9:25:47 AM
From: stsimon  Respond to of 218014
 
The U.S.A. isn't going nuts, just the folks who voted for the idiot-in-chief.