To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1058383 ) 3/7/2018 2:08:37 PM From: RetiredNow Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573437 Well, there are inherent problems with all polls. So let's say you do the right thing, like Rasmussen, and look at likely voters who are also registered voters. Then you construct your sample to be broken down into Democrats, Republicans, Independents, etc. to reflect the percentages among those likely registered voters. This is most likely to minimize sampling bias, but what if someone like Obama comes along who is a smooth talker and gets all the Independents like me to swing to vote for him? How would Rasmussen's poll predict that? All polls can do is take very good guesses and put the appropriate margin of error around it. Now, if you ask me how to improve all of this, then I can tell you how. Start using machine learning and 100 other metrics that you can acquire from the Internet browsing and buying habits of your targeted sample. From those statistics, you can probably improve your accuracy greatly. Then track those people over time to see how their preferences may be changing when a new unknown like Obama shows up. These kinds of stats can track momentum swings a whole lot better. It's kind of like what the quant jocks and algos from Wall Street do. They leverage really seemingly disconnected data feeds to make some really accurate guess about stock movements, then they shave points to make billions. That kind of sophisticated machine learning and real time data feeds to track voter preferences is not being done to the best of my knowledge. Or it's not being done by the polls you and I have access to, but maybe it is being done by the inside polls that are kept under lock and key and used by the candidates themselves.