Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (36189)	1/12/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: Sid Turtlman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

al-len: The old filings are out of date. Even if they were honest (which they were not) they would describe what was happening a year ago. The SEC has deadlines (45 days after a quarter for a 10-Q, 90 days after the end of the fiscal year for a 10-K) when it wants the documents to be submitted. And it really doesn't like false information on them, or violations of accounting rules. So until RMIL submits up to date filings, and they are honest, and the 10-K has been audited by a CPA authorized to practice before the SEC, the company is not in compliance.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (36189)	1/12/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Al-len, My apologies for not being more clear. Sorry.... :0) NASD requires, at a minimum, that previously reporting companys provide current(up-to-date) financials for the past year, to include the most recent 10K. The opinion of the gentleman at OTC compliance was that NASD would require all delinquent Q's as well as a current 10K, unless there were extenuating circumstances (he didn't elaborate, but I think he was just leaving room for the ever present exception). And this gentleman stated that he had not seen any cases in recent memory where old and clearly not current filings would suffice. Hey this is all a learning experience for me as well. I understood the basic concepts of 15c2-11, but I'm receiving an education on the specifics of the process. So in a nut shell.. reporting companies must have filings for the past year, to include delinquent filings. I believe the K must be fully audited. Non-reporting companies must submit financial statements for the past two years. (basically what they required when they first were listed for public trading.) But they also must be current, but not necessarily audited. (it would help... :0) Hope this clarifies the situation. Again, it is how I understand it from what I have been told from NASD. Regards, Ron